Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology


Home   Genes    Leukemias    Solid Tumors    Cancer-Prone    Deep Insight    Case Reports    Journals   Portal    Teaching   

X Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NA
    

Angiogenic factors and cancer therapy

 

Yihai Cao1, 2, 3 *

1 Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
2 Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
3 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK

* Correspondence, galley proofs and reprint requests should be primarily addressed to:
Yihai Cao, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology,
Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Tel: (+46)-8-5248 7596, Fax: (+46)-8-33 13 99,
E-mail: yihai.cao@ki.se

 

December 2013

 

Key words: Angiogenesis, vasculature, growth factors, cancer, metastasis

Abstract

Tumor growth and metastasis are dependent on neovascularization, which is mainly accomplished by the process of angiogenesis-sprouting of new microvessels from the existing blood vessels. To gain its ability of growth and invasiveness, malignant cells often express high levels of angiogenic factors that stimulate tumor angiogenesis and remodel tumor vessels. In addition to malignant cells, other host cells in the tumor microenvironment, including inflammatory cells, stromal fibroblasts and perivascular cells also significantly contribute to production of angiogenic factors and cytokines. Co-existence of various angiogenic factors and cytokines will inevitably cause interplay of various signaling pathways, leading to synergistic effects of tumor angiogenesis. Thus, therapeutic development of angiogenic factor inhibitors should be aimed to block not only the vertical signaling pathway triggered by a specific factor, but the horizontal interplay of various angiogenic pathways. This review discusses the mechanisms that underlie tumor angiogenesis, provides a few examples of angiogenic pathways that are commonly seen in most tumor types, and discusses the challenges of antiangiogenic cancer therapy.

Discovery of tumor angiogenic factors

In 1971, Judah Folkman, in his hypothetical and conceptual article, proposed that tumors produce angiogenic factors and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis would offer a new therapeutic option for treatment of cancer (Folkman, 1971). Based on this hypothesis, extensive research was initiated during early research for identification of tumor-derived-angiogenic factors and accumulating evidence supported the existence of tumor angiogenic factors although their identities remained unknown at that time (Folkman et al., 1971; Langer et al., 1976). The first angiogenic factor was isolated from the pituitary of mammals (Gospodarowicz, 1976). In 1984, Folkman and colleagues isolated the first tumor angiogenic factor, i.e., basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF or FGF-2), from a chondrosarcoma, and thus validating the concept that tumors produce angiogenic factors to induce neovascularization (Shing et al., 1984). Simultaneous to identification of tumor angiogenic factors, Dvorak and colleagues identified a potent vascular permeability factor (VPF) from tumor cells (Senger et al., 1983). These initial findings demonstrated that tumor-derived angiogenenic factors are able to stimulate angiogenesis and to modulate vascular structures. The same VPF, clones sequenced by Connolly and colleagues, was found to be structurally related to platelet-derived growth factor (Keck et al., 1989). In the same issue of Science magazine, Dr. Napoleone Ferrara and colleagues published their findings on identification of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a potent angiogenic factor, which sequence identity with VPF (Leung et al., 1989). These initial findings paved new avenues for subsequent identification and cloning of numerous other angiogenic factors related to tumor growth and invasion, including those members in the VEGF, FGF, PDGF, angiopoietin, and notch ligand families.

Tumor microenvironment and the switch to an angiogenic phenotype

Genetic instability of malignant cells often leads to accumulation of mutations of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes and these mutated oncogenic proteins often upregulate expression levels of angiogenic factors (Cao et al., 2009). The fact that tumor tissues contain heterogenic populations of malignant cells implies that various tumor cells even in the same tumor mass would produce different levels of angiogeneic factors. Although the clinical significance of highly angiogenic tumor cells in tumor growth and invasion is not fully understood, it is reasonably speculated that the highly angiogenic tumor cell population might eventually dominate the entire tumor mass owing to their growth advantages. In contrast to tumor cells, somatic cells in healthy adult tissues may only produce modest levels of proangiogenic factors, which are not able to induce an angiogenic phenotype. Additionally, endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors are predominately expressed at high levels to prevent excessive neovascularization (Cao, 2008). Thus, angiogenesis rarely occurs in healthy adult tissues, except in the reproductive organs and tissue regeneration. To create an angiogenic phenotype, tumors have to tip the balance of angiogenic factors over inhibitors (Figure 1). Other cell types in the tumor microenvironment including inflammatory cells and stromal fibroblasts are also significant sources of tumor angiogenic factors and they significantly contribute to the switch of tumor angiogenesis (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Angiogenic switch in tumor tissues. Tumor cells together with other host cells including inflammatory cells and stromal fibroblasts produce high levels of proangiogenic factors and reduced levels of endogenous inhibitors, tipping the balance towards a proangiogenic phenotype.

Angiogenic signaling pathways

Since identification of VEGF and FGF-2 as potent angiogenic factors in 1980s, numerous angiogenic pathways have been discovered and their specific roles in regulation of tumor angiogenesis and vascular remodeling have been defined. Most angiogenic factors trigger angiogenic signals through specific interaction with their cell surface receptors that often contain tyrosine kinase domains in endothelial cells. In general, various angiogenic factors appear to have distinct functions in regulation of vessel growth, vascular permeability and remodeling. VEGF is a potent angiogenic and vascular permeability factor that induces vascular sprouting and vascular leakiness (Leung et al., 1989; Senger et al., 1983). The Dll4-Notch signaling system prevents excessive vascular sprouting from the "stalk region" of blood vessels (Noguera-Troise et al., 2006; Ridgway et al., 2006) (Figure 2). The PDGF-BB-PDGFR-β signaling in perivascular cells such as pericytes mediates recruitment of these mural cells onto the newly formed vasculatures (Lindahl et al., 1997). These distinctive functions can be divided even within the same family angiogenic factors. For example, Ang1 and Ang2 within the angiopoietin family seem to display opposing effects on vascular remodeling even though they bind to the same endothelial Tie2 receptor (Maisonpierre et al., 1997). Thus, angiogenic factors whether within the same family or in different families have distinctive roles in modulation of vessel growth and remodeling. During tumor angiogenesis, these signaling pathways may become uncoordinated, leading to the formation of disorganized and primitive vascular networks.

Figure 2. Angiogenic regulators that control the precise steps of new vessel growth. VEGF is a driving force that induces tip cell formation through activation of VEGFR2 signaling. Angiogenic endothelial cells produce PDGF-BB to recruit pericytes onto newly formed vessels to prevent excessive sprouting. The Dll4-Notch1 signaling also prevent excessive vascular sprouting from "stalk cells".

Interplay between angiogenic factors

Co-existence of various angiogenic factors, cytokines, signaling receptors and intracellular signaling components often results in crosstalk between various signaling pathways. Thus, in tumor tissues various angiogenic factors and cytokines not only transduce their signals vertically, but also interact each other horizontally. At the ligand level, various angiogenic factors with the same family can interact each other. For example, VEGF-A and PlGF or VEGF-B can form heterodimers in addition to their respective homodimers and heterodimers may different biological functions (Cao et al., 1996; Olofsson et al., 1996). Similarly, PDGF-A and PDGF-B can also form heterodimers that display overlapping but yet different functions from their corresponding homodimers (Heldin and Westermark, 1989b). The same heterodimerization mechanism also exists in various VEGF receptor molecules and PDGF receptor molecules (Heldin and Westermark, 1989a; Mac Gabhann and Popel, 2007). Similarly, interactions between cell surface receptors beyond the same family also exist, demonstrating the complex signaling transduction of these receptors. Activation of a particular signaling pathway often induces and amplifies signaling pathways. For example, stimulation of endothelial cells and angiogenesis by FGF-2 induces expression levels of PDGFR expression, and thus triggering a synergistic angiogenic response (Cao et al., 2003). Such a synergistic angiogenic activity in the tumor microenvironment promotes tumor growth, invasion and metastasis (Nissen et al., 2007). Therefore, assessment of angiogenic profiles in a given tumor tissue should consider potential interaction relations between various angiogenic factors and signaling pathways.

Targeting angiogenic pathways in tumors

The original idea of blocking tumor-derived angiogenic factors for cancer therapy was raised by Dr. Judah Folkman. In his conceptual paper, Folkman wrote "One approach to the initiation of 'anti-angiogenesis' would be the production of an antibody against tumor angiogenic factor"(Folkman, 1971). His prediction and vision were validated in human cancer patients 33 years later with approval of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF neutralizing antibody, by US FDA in 2004 for treatment of human colorectal cancer (Hurwitz et al., 2004). In fact, bevacizumab remains as the most commonly used antiangiogenic drugs for treatment of various human cancers either in combination with chemotherapy or monotherapy settings. Antiangiogenic drugs that block signaling pathways can be divided into several categories according to their targets and specificity: 1) Inhibition of angiogenic factor production from various cell types of tumors. These may include inhibition of transcription and translation of a specific angiogenic factor; 2) Functional neutralization of angiogenic factors. Bevacizumab targeting VEGF is one of such neutralizing antibodies (Hurwitz et al., 2004); 3) Anti-receptor neutralizing antibodies. Similar to angiogenic ligands, binding of antibodies to specific regions of extracellular domains of a receptor could also effectively block their ligand-triggered angiogenic signaling. Ramucizumab, an anti-VEGFR2 neutralizing antibody is an example of such drugs that are under clinical development (Fuchs et al., 2014); 4) Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that block angiogenic receptor functions. There are 7 currently US-FDA-approved antiangiogenic TKIs, including: axitinib, cabozantinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, sorafenib, sunitinib, and vandetanib (Choueiri et al., 2012; Cohen et al., 2008; Escudier et al., 2007; George et al., 2012; Houvras and Wirth, 2011; Motzer et al., 2013; Motzer et al., 2007). In general, TKIs lacks specificity and each TKI blocks the activity of several tyrosine kinases. The antiangiogenic TKIs share overlapping, but yet target different spectrums of angiogenic pathways. VEGFR2, as a key functional receptor for VEGF-induced angiogenesis, is one of the common targets of these TKIs. TKIs have been clinically used for treatment of various human cancers; 5) Inhibition of downstream signaling components. For example, mTOR (mammalian targets of rapamycin) inhibitors including temsirolimus and everolimus potently suppress tumor angiogenesis (Fazio et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2011); 6) Generic angiogenesis inhibitors. Thalidomide is an example of generic angiogenesis inhibitor that blocks a common pathway of angiogenesis that is currently used for treatment of multiple myeloma (Singhal et al., 1999); 7) Endogenous angiogenesis inhibitors. These inhibitors such as angiostatin and endostatin exhibit a broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against tumor angiogenesis induced by various stimuli (O'Reilly et al., 1997; O'Reilly et al., 1994). A variant version of endostatin has been approved by the Chinese FDA for treatment of lung cancer in human patients (Han et al., 2011).
Despite successful development of these drugs for treatment of human cancers, the survival beneficial effects, in general, are rather modest for most cancer types. A majority of cancer patients show intrinsic resistance toward these antiangiogenic drugs (Cao and Langer, 2008, 2010). For those patients who initially respond to antiangiogenic drugs can also develop evasive refractoriness. Additionally, antiangiogenic drugs also produce various side effects in cancer patients. Given the essential roles of VEGF in regulation of human physiology, it is perhaps not unexpected to observe broad side effects of anti-VEGF-based antiangiogenic drugs in human patients.

Lymphangiogenic factors and therapeutic targets

Tumor-produced angiogenic factors not only stimulate angiogenesis, but often induce lymphangiogenesis, which significantly contribute to lymph node metastasis (Cao, 2005). Similar to blood vessel angiogenesis, tumor lymphangiogenesis is also regulated by multiple growth factors. Members in the VEGF, FGF, PDGF, Ang, HGF, and IGF families have been found to actively participate in regulation of lymphangiogenesis (Cao, 2005). Moreover, these factors induce intra- and peri-tumoral lymphangiogenesis that facilitate lymphatic metastasis. Among these known lymphangiogenic factors, the VEGF-C-VEGFR3 signaling system is probably the most well characterized signaling pathway in regulation of physiological and pathological lymphangiogenesis (Adams and Alitalo, 2007; Stacker et al., 2002). VEGFR3 seems to be exclusively expressed on lymphatic endothelial cells although it is also found in angiogenic endothelial cells (Tammela et al., 2008). Several lymphangiogenic factors indirectly induce lymphangiogenesis through activation of the VEGF-C-VEGFR3 signaling system. This indirect regulatory mechanism occurs at both VEGF-C ligand and VEGFR3 receptor levels at which other factors often upregulate expression of these two signaling molecules. Notably, the VEGFR3-mediated lymphatic endothelial tip cell formation is probably essential for other lymphangiogenic factor-induced lymphangiogenesis. For example, FGF-2-induced lymphangiogenesis requires the VEGFR3 signaling system for sprouting and inhibition VEGFR3 completely ablates FGF-2-induced lymphangiogenesis (Cao et al., 2012). Given the essential role of lymphangiogenesis in cancer metastasis, inhibition of lymphangiogenesis would in principle be a valid approach for anti-metastatic cancer therapy. However, development of drugs to block cancer metastasis for clinical use remains a challenging issue and pharmaceutical companies remain reluctant to pursue this avenue.

Mechanistic challenges of antiangiogenic cancer therapy

The initial antiangiogenic concept for treatment of cancer raised by Judah Folkman has led to successful development of antiangiogenic drugs for treatment of various human cancers. Despite the fact that the growth of all solid tumors is dependent on angiogenesis, the response rate of antiangiogenic therapy in human cancer patients is rather modest (Cao and Langer, 2010; Kerbel, 2008). In most types of cancers, antiangiogenic drugs are delivered together with chemotherapeutics or in combination with other therapeutic modalities and antiangiogenic monotherapy produce insignificant improvement of patient survivals. This clinical finding is in marked contrast to the treatment regimen in preclinical tumor models in which most antiangiogenic agents show potent antitumor effects when delivered as a single agent. Why would human and mouse tumors respond so differently to the same drug (Cao, 2011)? This important question remains unresolved at this time of writing. One of challenging issues of translating preclinical findings into clinical practice is the relevance of preclinical mouse tumor models to human patients. In mouse tumor models, we often use genetically identical mice to study the effect of a given antiangiogenic agent whereas each human cancer patient carries genetic information that is different from others. Tumors in human patients contain different mutations of crucial genes related to cell growth and oncogenesis whereas mouse tumors are often identical from the same cell line. Human cancers are treated at different stages of malignant progression and mouse tumors are often treated at the same time and similar size during cancer development. Importantly, in mouse tumor models therapeutic efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs is assessed by measuring tumor size and beneficial effects of antiangiogenic therapy are often determined based on survival improvement. During clinical practice, it is increasingly noticed that tumor size cannot be used as a reliable surrogate marker to predict survival benefits and antiangiogenic therapy. Another important issue is the mechanism that underlies combination therapy, which remains unknown. A couple of hypotheses have been proposed to explain therapeutic benefits underlying the combination of antiangiogenic drugs with chemotherapeutics. Anti-antiangiogenic drug-induced vascular normalization modulates chemotherapeutic delivery in tumor tissues offers an attractive mechanism for explaining the beneficial effects of combination therapy (Jain, 2005). Despite some interesting findings in mouse tumor model, the vascular normalization concept needs to be validated in human cancer patients (Van der Veldt et al., 2012). Another interesting concept is that antiangiogenic drugs significantly reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity in cancer hosts (Zhang et al., 2011). Again, this interesting concept warrants clinical validation. Taken together, the mechanisms by which antiangiogenic drugs improve survivals of cancer patients remains an enigma despite these drugs suppress tumor angiogenesis. Future preclinical and clinical studies should focus on mechanisms that underlie clinical benefits of these drugs in cancer patients.

Acknowledgements

Y.C.'s laboratory is supported by research grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Karolinska Institute Foundation, the Karolinska Institute distinguished professor award, the Torsten Söderbergs foundation, Söderbergs stiftelse, the European Union Integrated Project of Metoxia (Project no. 222741), and the European Research Council (ERC) advanced grant ANGIOFAT (Project no 250021).

Bibliography

Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications.
Folkman J.
N Engl J Med. 1971 Nov 18;285(21):1182-6. (REVIEW)
PMID 4938153
 
Isolation of a tumor factor responsible for angiogenesis.
Folkman J, Merler E, Abernathy C, Williams G.
J Exp Med. 1971 Feb 1;133(2):275-88.
PMID 4332371
 
Humoral control of cell proliferation: the role of fibroblast growth factor in regeneration, angiogenesis, wound healing, and neoplastic growth.
Gospodarowicz D.
Prog Clin Biol Res. 1976;9:1-19.
PMID 1030795
 
Isolations of a cartilage factor that inhibits tumor neovascularization.
Langer R, Brem H, Falterman K, Klein M, Folkman J.
Science. 1976 Jul 2;193(4247):70-2.
PMID 935859
 
Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid.
Senger DR, Galli SJ, Dvorak AM, Perruzzi CA, Harvey VS, Dvorak HF.
Science. 1983 Feb 25;219(4587):983-5.
PMID 6823562
 
Heparin affinity: purification of a tumor-derived capillary endothelial cell growth factor.
Shing Y, Folkman J, Sullivan R, Butterfield C, Murray J, Klagsbrun M.
Science. 1984 Mar 23;223(4642):1296-9.
PMID 6199844
 
Platelet-derived growth factor: three isoforms and two receptor types.
Heldin CH, Westermark B.
Trends Genet. 1989a Apr;5(4):108-11. (REVIEW)
PMID 2543106
 
Platelet-derived growth factors: a family of isoforms that bind to two distinct receptors.
Heldin CH, Westermark B.
Br Med Bull. 1989b Apr;45(2):453-64. (REVIEW)
PMID 2557116
 
Vascular permeability factor, an endothelial cell mitogen related to PDGF.
Keck PJ, Hauser SD, Krivi G, Sanzo K, Warren T, Feder J, Connolly DT.
Science. 1989 Dec 8;246(4935):1309-12.
PMID 2479987
 
Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen.
Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N.
Science. 1989 Dec 8;246(4935):1306-9.
PMID 2479986
 
Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma.
O'Reilly MS, Holmgren L, Shing Y, Chen C, Rosenthal RA, Moses M, Lane WS, Cao Y, Sage EH, Folkman J.
Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):315-28.
PMID 7525077
 
Heterodimers of placenta growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor. Endothelial activity, tumor cell expression, and high affinity binding to Flk-1/KDR.
Cao Y, Chen H, Zhou L, Chiang MK, Anand-Apte B, Weatherbee JA, Wang Y, Fang F, Flanagan JG, Tsang ML.
J Biol Chem. 1996 Feb 9;271(6):3154-62.
PMID 8621715
 
Vascular endothelial growth factor B, a novel growth factor for endothelial cells.
Olofsson B, Pajusola K, Kaipainen A, von Euler G, Joukov V, Saksela O, Orpana A, Pettersson RF, Alitalo K, Eriksson U.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 19;93(6):2576-81.
PMID 8637916
 
Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice.
Lindahl P, Johansson BR, Leveen P, Betsholtz C.
Science. 1997 Jul 11;277(5323):242-5.
PMID 9211853
 
Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis.
Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand SJ, Radziejewski C, Compton D, McClain J, Aldrich TH, Papadopoulos N, Daly TJ, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD.
Science. 1997 Jul 4;277(5322):55-60.
PMID 9204896
 
Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth.
O'Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, Fukai N, Vasios G, Lane WS, Flynn E, Birkhead JR, Olsen BR, Folkman J.
Cell. 1997 Jan 24;88(2):277-85.
PMID 9008168
 
Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma.
Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zeddis J, Barlogie B.
N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 18;341(21):1565-71.
PMID 10564685
 
Lymphangiogenesis and cancer metastasis.
Stacker SA, Achen MG, Jussila L, Baldwin ME, Alitalo K.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Aug;2(8):573-83. (REVIEW)
PMID 12154350
 
Angiogenic synergism, vascular stability and improvement of hind-limb ischemia by a combination of PDGF-BB and FGF-2.
Cao R, Brakenhielm E, Pawliuk R, Wariaro D, Post MJ, Wahlberg E, Leboulch P, Cao Y.
Nat Med. 2003 May;9(5):604-13. Epub 2003 Mar 31.
PMID 12669032
 
Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2335-42.
PMID 15175435
 
Opinion: emerging mechanisms of tumour lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis.
Cao Y.
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Sep;5(9):735-43. (REVIEW)
PMID 16079909
 
Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy.
Jain RK.
Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):58-62. (REVIEW)
PMID 15637262
 
Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis.
Noguera-Troise I, Daly C, Papadopoulos NJ, Coetzee S, Boland P, Gale NW, Lin HC, Yancopoulos GD, Thurston G.
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1032-7.
PMID 17183313
 
Inhibition of Dll4 signalling inhibits tumour growth by deregulating angiogenesis.
Ridgway J, Zhang G, Wu Y, Stawicki S, Liang WC, Chanthery Y, Kowalski J, Watts RJ, Callahan C, Kasman I, Singh M, Chien M, Tan C, Hongo JA, de Sauvage F, Plowman G, Yan M.
Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1083-7.
PMID 17183323
 
Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.
Adams RH, Alitalo K.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Jun;8(6):464-78. (REVIEW)
PMID 17522591
 
Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma.
Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM, Szczylik C, Oudard S, Siebels M, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Solska E, Desai AA, Rolland F, Demkow T, Hutson TE, Gore M, Freeman S, Schwartz B, Shan M, Simantov R, Bukowski RM; TARGET Study Group.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):125-34.
PMID 17215530
 
Temsirolimus for advanced renal-cell carcinoma.
Fazio N, Dettori M, Lorizzo K.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 6;357(10):1050; author reply 1050-1.
PMID 17804854
 
Dimerization of VEGF receptors and implications for signal transduction: a computational study.
Mac Gabhann F, Popel AS.
Biophys Chem. 2007 Jul;128(2-3):125-39. Epub 2007 Mar 24.
PMID 17442480
 
Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.
Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Kim ST, Chen I, Bycott PW, Baum CM, Figlin RA.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):115-24.
PMID 17215529
 
Angiogenic factors FGF2 and PDGF-BB synergistically promote murine tumor neovascularization and metastasis.
Nissen LJ, Cao R, Hedlund EM, Wang Z, Zhao X, Wetterskog D, Funa K, Brakenhielm E, Cao Y.
J Clin Invest. 2007 Oct;117(10):2766-77.
PMID 17909625
 
Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic development of angiogenesis inhibitors.
Cao Y.
Adv Cancer Res. 2008;100:113-31. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)00004-3. (REVIEW)
PMID 18620094
 
A review of Judah Folkman's remarkable achievements in biomedicine.
Cao Y, Langer R.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13203-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806582105. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
PMID 18772371
 
Axitinib is an active treatment for all histologic subtypes of advanced thyroid cancer: results from a phase II study.
Cohen EE, Rosen LS, Vokes EE, Kies MS, Forastiere AA, Worden FP, Kane MA, Sherman E, Kim S, Bycott P, Tortorici M, Shalinsky DR, Liau KF, Cohen RB.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 10;26(29):4708-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9566. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
PMID 18541897
 
Tumor angiogenesis.
Kerbel RS.
N Engl J Med. 2008 May 8;358(19):2039-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706596. (REVIEW)
PMID 18463380
 
Blocking VEGFR-3 suppresses angiogenic sprouting and vascular network formation.
Tammela T, Zarkada G, Wallgard E, Murtomaki A, Suchting S, Wirzenius M, Waltari M, Hellstrom M, Schomber T, Peltonen R, Freitas C, Duarte A, Isoniemi H, Laakkonen P, Christofori G, Yla-Herttuala S, Shibuya M, Pytowski B, Eichmann A, Betsholtz C, Alitalo K.
Nature. 2008 Jul 31;454(7204):656-60. doi: 10.1038/nature07083. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
PMID 18594512
 
Improvement of antiangiogenic cancer therapy by understanding the mechanisms of angiogenic factor interplay and drug resistance.
Cao Y, Zhong W, Sun Y.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2009 Oct;19(5):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 27. (REVIEW)
PMID 19481151
 
Antiangiogenic cancer therapy: why do mouse and human patients respond in a different way to the same drug?
Cao Y.
Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55(4-5):557-62. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.103236yc. (REVIEW)
PMID 21858776
 
[A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety study to evaluate the clinical effects and quality of life of paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) alone or combined with endostar for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)].
Han BH, Xiu QY, Wang HM, Shen J, Gu AQ, Luo Y, Bai CX, Guo SL, Liu WC, Zhuang ZX, Zhang Y, Zhao YZ, Jiang LY, Shi CL, Jin B, Zhou JY, Jin XQ.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;33(11):854-9.
PMID 22335953
 
Cabozantinib in medullary thyroid carcinoma: time to focus the spotlight on this rare disease.
Houvras Y, Wirth LJ.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 1;29(19):2616-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.0505. Epub 2011 May 23.
PMID 21606409
 
Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, Haas T, Lincy J, Lebwohl D, Oberg K; RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):514-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290.
PMID 21306238
 
Antiangiogenic agents significantly improve survival in tumor-bearing mice by increasing tolerance to chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
Zhang D, Hedlund EM, Lim S, Chen F, Zhang Y, Sun B, Cao Y.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 8;108(10):4117-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016220108. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
PMID 21367692
 
Collaborative interplay between FGF-2 and VEGF-C promotes lymphangiogenesis and metastasis.
Cao R, Ji H, Feng N, Zhang Y, Yang X, Andersson P, Sun Y, Tritsaris K, Hansen AJ, Dissing S, Cao Y.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 25;109(39):15894-9. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
PMID 22967508
 
Double-blind, randomized trial of docetaxel plus vandetanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in platinum-pretreated metastatic urothelial cancer.
Choueiri TK, Ross RW, Jacobus S, Vaishampayan U, Yu EY, Quinn DI, Hahn NM, Hutson TE, Sonpavde G, Morrissey SC, Buckle GC, Kim WY, Petrylak DP, Ryan CW, Eisenberger MA, Mortazavi A, Bubley GJ, Taplin ME, Rosenberg JE, Kantoff PW.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):507-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7002. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
PMID 22184381
 
Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients with metastatic and/or unresectable GI stromal tumor after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: a multicenter phase II trial.
George S, Wang Q, Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Zhu M, Butrynski JE, Morgan JA, Wagner AJ, Choy E, Tap WD, Yap JT, Van den Abbeele AD, Manola JB, Solomon SM, Fletcher JA, von Mehren M, Demetri GD.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;30(19):2401-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9394. Epub 2012 May 21.
PMID 22614970
 
Rapid decrease in delivery of chemotherapy to tumors after anti-VEGF therapy: implications for scheduling of anti-angiogenic drugs.
Van der Veldt AA, Lubberink M, Bahce I, Walraven M, de Boer MP, Greuter HN, Hendrikse NH, Eriksson J, Windhorst AD, Postmus PE, Verheul HM, Serne EH, Lammertsma AA, Smit EF.
Cancer Cell. 2012 Jan 17;21(1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.023.
PMID 22264790
 
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.
Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, Nathan P, Staehler M, de Souza P, Merchan JR, Boleti E, Fife K, Jin J, Jones R, Uemura H, De Giorgi U, Harmenberg U, Wang J, Sternberg CN, Deen K, McCann L, Hackshaw MD, Crescenzo R, Pandite LN, Choueiri TK.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989.
PMID 23964934
 
Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ, Dumitru F, Passalacqua R, Goswami C, Safran H, dos Santos LV, Aprile G, Ferry DR, Melichar B, Tehfe M, Topuzov E, Zalcberg JR, Chau I, Campbell W, Sivanandan C, Pikiel J, Koshiji M, Hsu Y, Liepa AM, Gao L, Schwartz JD, Tabernero J; REGARD Trial Investigators.
Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):31-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61719-5. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
PMID 24094768
 
Written2013-12Yihai Cao
of Microbiology, Tumor, Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

Citation

This paper should be referenced as such :
Cao, Y
Angiogenic factors, cancer therapy
Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. 2014;18(6):447-452.
Free journal version : [ pdf ]   [ DOI ]
On line version : http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org/Deep/AngiogenicFactorsID20129.htm

© Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology
indexed on : Tue Sep 26 12:38:12 CEST 2017


Home   Genes    Leukemias    Solid Tumors    Cancer-Prone    Deep Insight    Case Reports    Journals   Portal    Teaching   

X Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NA

For comments and suggestions or contributions, please contact us

jlhuret@AtlasGeneticsOncology.org.