DNA is continually subject to the threat of damage by a wide variety of external agents as well as by spontaneous endogenous processes (Friedberg et al., 1995). A given agent or process can produce a complex variety of DNA lesions: for example, ionizing radiation generates free radicals that make single and double strand breaks, destroy deoxyribose residues and induce numerous base alterations (Frimmer et al., 1976). DNA damage can be classified in several ways. One broad category consists of base modifications, including chemical alterations, covalent joining between adjacent bases (the predominant lesion is the UV-induced pyrimidine-pyrimidine dimer (see nucleotide excision repair) and base loss. These damages to DNA templates can result in misincorporation during replication and can lead to heritable changes in DNA sequence. Another type of damage is intrastrand cross-linking, which can prevent DNA replication and transcription. This review focuses on the repair of a third type of DNA damage, DNA strand breaks, and more particularly, DNA double- strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs may occur as a result of exposure to such exogenous factors such as radiation or chemical DNA-damaging agents. DSBs can also arise as programmed developmental modifications, such as immunoglobulin rearrangement or in the initiation of meiotic recombination. There is also growing evidence that DSBs can form when DNA polymerases stall at natural replication pause sites or when they encounter other types of DNA damage (reviewed in Rothstein et al., 2000). Since DSBs may be lethal for a cell, organisms have developed several repair pathways.
Modes of DSB repair and some chromosomal consequences of faulty repair
repair (see also " An introduction to chromosomal
Homologous Repair (a) Precise homologous recombination with the sister chromatid restores the original sequence. (b) Recombination between allelic sequences on homologous chromosomes can lead to Loss Of Heterozygosity if a damaged wild type sequence is repaired using a mutant allele as a template. (c) A recombination event between two homologous sequences located in non equivalent positions on sister chromatids can give rise to an unequal exchange. In this example, one chromatid has lost one of two repeated sequences and the other has gained a repeat. (d) When a DSB is repaired by an exchange between two homologous sequences located on different chromosomes, a reciprocal translocation can result.
Non Homologous End Joining
(e) Following processing of a DSB, a rejoining event can lead to an intra-chromosomal deletion. (f) Ligation of two DNA ends located on different chromosomes results in a non reciprocal translocation.
An important DSB repair pathway is Homologous Recombination (HR), which is potentially a very precise mode of repair. When a homologous sequence at the equivalent position on a sister chromatid is used as a template for repair, the original sequence of the broken chromosome can be restored (Jablonovich et al., 1999) (Figure 1a). Recombinational repair may also utilize allelic sequences (i.e., at equivalent positions on homologous chromosomes) in the resolution of DSBs (Figure 1b). Although recombination between allelic sequences is not mutagenic per se, this mode of repair can be associated with another hazard: loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Recessive mutations may be uncovered in a heterozygote, if a damaged wild type allele is lost and a second copy of a mutant allele is concomitantly gained (Lasko et al., 1991). Another unfavorable outcome of HR is chromosomal rearrangement, which can happen if recombination occurs between homologous sequences at non allelic loci. This possibility arises because a large fraction of mammalian genomes consists of numerous classes of repetitive DNA sequences distributed among numerous loci. (For example, in human cells there are approximately 106 Alu elements.) If an exchange takes place between repeats at non equivalent positions on sister chromatids, deletions or expansions can result (Figure 1c). Exchanges between repeats on different chromosomes can give rise to translocations (Figure 1d).
The principal DSB repair mechanism in higher eukaryotes is Non Homologous End Joining (NHEJ), which entails the simple ligation of two DNA ends with little or no homology to one another (Karran, 2000; Lewis and Resnick, 2000). Ligation can precisely rejoin two DNA ends so as introduce no changes in sequence. However, NHEJ is most often accompanied by remodeling or processing of the ends before the rejoining event. (Figure 1e). The occurrence of several DSBs in the cell can lead to the joining of DNA ends that are located on two different chromosomes (Figure 1f). Thus, NHEJ is relatively error-prone and is frequently associated with genomic rearrangements such as deletions and translocations.
In this review, we focus on the pathways and enzymology of DSB main mechanisms that cells use to repair DSBs. Many insights concerning DSB repair originated in studies of meiotic and mitotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Therefore, we begin with a discussion of the DSB repair model as it applies to meiotic HR as a means to introduce many of the key proteins implicated in DSB repair in higher organisms. We then describe mitotic HR and NHEJ in yeast and mammalian cells, emphasizing both parallels and differences between the two systems. We also outline some of the cellular responses to DNA damage. And finally, we describe several human diseases for which DSB repair defects are responsible.
Meiotic DSB repair in yeast provides a model to illustrate HR
Much of what is known about the mechanism of the repair of DSBs by HR is derived from genetic and biochemical studies of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast offers many advantages for the study of DSB induction and repair, including the ease of synchronization of cells for simultaneous entry into the meiotic cell cycle and the relative facility of designing screens to detect mutations that affect a given point of the process. Also, DNA intermediates in the repair process can be isolated and characterized. In yeast, meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed DSBs at numerous sites throughout the genome (Baudat and Nicolas, 1997; Gerton et al., 2000; Kleckner, 1996; Roeder, 1997; Smith and Nicolas, 1998). The repair of these breaks establishes connections (crossovers) between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers are critical to the proper disjunction of homologs from one another in the first of the two meiotic divisions. They are also responsible for the reciprocal exchange of sequences between homologous chromosomes, thereby contributing to genetic variation. In yeast and in higher organisms, failures to create DSBs, or defects in the repair of DSBs, lead to random disjunction of chromosomes, hence aneuploidy and gamete inviability (Bascom-Slack et al., 1997). Mammalian homologs have been identified for many of the components of the yeast meiotic DSB repair pathway, which underscores the likelihood that observations concerning the mechanism of DSB-initiated meiotic recombination in yeast are applicable to human cells (Table 1). Similarly, as exemplified by the homology of the the yeast DSB repair protein Rad51 (and with Rad51 homologs found in humans and other higher organisms) with the bacterial strand exchange protein RecA, the yeast meiotic DSB repair pathway represents a eukaryotic adaptation of primordial bacterial and archaebacterial repair systems (Ogawa et al., 1993a; Ogawa et al., 1993b; Sandler et al., 1996).
|Yeast||Human||Disruption in mice||Molecular Function|
|RAD51||RAD51||lethal (Tsuzuki et al., 1996)||RecA homolog, pairing and strand exchange|
|RAD55, RAD57||RAD51 B
|homologous recombination deficiency (Brenneman et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 1999; Pierce et al., 1999; Takata et al., 2000)
midgestation lethality (Pittman and Schimenti, 2000; Shu et al., 1999)
|RecA homolog, stimulates pairing and strand exchange||DMC1||DMC1||sterility (Pittman et al., 1998; Yoshida et al., 1998)||RecA homolog, pairing|
|RAD54||RAD54L RAD54B||radiation sensitivity (Essers et al., 1997)||DNA dependent ATPase, involved in pairing and recombination between sister chromatids|
|RAD52||RAD52||homologous recombination deficiency (Rijkers et al., 1998)||ssDNA annealing, stimulates pairing and strand exchange|
|RAD50||RAD50||lethal (Luo et al., 1999)||DNA-binding|
|MRE11||MRE11||lethal (Xiao and Weaver, 1997)||ssDNA endonuclease,|
3' to 5' exonuclease
|XRS2||NBS1||lethal (Zhu et al., 2001)|
non-homologous end joining deficiency (Gu et al., 1997a; Gu et al., 1997b)
|DNA end binding protein|
non-homologous end joining deficiency (Nussenzweig et al., 1996; Nussenzweig et al., 1997; Zhu et al., 1996)
|DNA end binding protein|
non-homologous end joining deficiency (Gao et al., 1998; Jhappan et al., 1997; Taccioli et al., 1998)
|DNL4||Ligase4||late embryonic lethality (Barnes et al., 1998; Frank et al., 1998)||DNA ligase|
|LIF1||XRCC4||lethal (Gao et al., 2000)||DNA ligase co-factor|
|BRCA1||lethal (Hakem et al., 1998)|
|BRCA2||lethal (Hakem et al., 1998; Suzuki et al., 1997)|
|ATM||growth retardation, neurologic dysfunction, male and female infertility defects in T lymphocyte maturation, extreme sensitivity to gamma-irradiation, malignant thymic lymphomas between 2 and 4 months of age (Barlow et al., 1996; Xu et al., 1996)||protein kinase|
Table 1: The DSB repair factors in yeast and their human homologs.
The mechanism of meiotic DSB repair by HR can be described by a model that was initially proposed to account for the resolution of broken DNA molecules in mitotic cells (Szostak et al., 1983). Many of the molecular events predicted by this model have been demonstrated to take place during yeast meiosis (Figure 2). Shortly after the synchronous entry of cells into meiosis, DSBs can be detected by Southern analysis at numerous loci, particularly those which are recombinational "hotspots" - they exhibit high frequencies of gene conversion and crossing over (Baudat and Nicolas, 1997) . At least twelve genes are required for meiotic DSB formation (reviewed in Smith and Nicolas, 1998). Although biochemical functions have not been established for most of them, DNA cleavage is likely mediated by the Spo11 protein in a sequence-independent manner (Bergerat et al., 1997; Keeney et al., 1997). Spo11 resembles archaebacterial type II topoisomerases, which create transient DSBs by a trans-esterification reaction that involves a covalent link between the protein and the DNA substrate. Spo11 homologs are phylogenetically ubiquitous, having been found in all kingdoms examined (Celerin et al., 2000; Dernburg et al., 1998; Grelon et al., 2001; Keeney et al., 1999; McKim and HayashiHagihara, 1998; Metzler-Guillemain and de Massy, 2000; Romanienko and CameriniOtero, 1999; Shannon et al., 1999; Tokuyama and Tokuyama, 2000). The meiotic failure of the mouse Spo11 mutant suggests that Spo11 proteins have a similarly critical role in initiating meiotic recombination in higher eukaryotes, including in the human germline (Baudat et al., 2000; Romanienko and Camerini-Otero, 2000). The Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 complex, which is involved in mitotic DSB repair (see below), is also required for DSB formation (reviewed in Smith and Nicolas, 1998). This complex is also implicated in the next molecularly detectable event of DSB repair, removal of the Spo11 protein and resection of the two DSB ends to varying extents by a 5' - 3' exonucleolytic activity. DSB processing results in the production of 3'-OH single-stranded DNA tails, which are highly recombinogenic and can invade a homologous duplex. Strand invasion requires the participation of several proteins related to bacterial RecA, including Rad51, Rad55, Rad57, and Dmc1 (see below). The Rad52 protein is also involved at this stage. Of these proteins, only Dmc1 is specific for meiotic recombination; the others are also required for mitotic DSB repair. Human (and other mammalian) homologs of Rad51, Dmc1, and Rad52 have been found (see below).
An important intermediate predicted by the DSB repair model is a joint molecule containing two Holliday junctions, and its existence has been confirmed by two-dimensional electrophoresis (Schwacha and Kleckner, 1994). This structure is produced by the Rad51-mediated invasion of a homologous DNA duplex by a single-stranded DNA end, resulting in the displacement of a so-called "D-loop" which can anneal to the non- invading strand of the processed DSB. DNA synthesis primed by the invading end drives further annealing of the D-loop to the initiating duplex. Migration of Holliday junctions (branch migration) can extend the tract of heteroduplex DNA (i.e., that which contains one single strand from each of the two recombining duplexes). Sequence differences in heteroduplex DNA created by strand invasion or by branch migration can be corrected by the mismatch repair (MMR) system, which also functions in the repair of mismatches that arise in mitotic cells. The principle components that resolve meiotic mismatches are Msh2, Msh3 and Msh6 (which share homology with the bacterial mismatch repair protein MutS), along with Mlh1 and Pms1 (homologs of bacterial MutL) (Borts et al., 2000). MutS-like proteins recognise and bind to DNA distortions caused by mismatches, and Mlh1 and Pms1 subsquently bind to the same sites but the details of later stages of repair are unclear. MutS and MutL homologs have been found in higher eukaryotes, including mice and humans, and in both, derangements of MMR function have been associated with cancer development. MMR proteins may also influence the extension and/or maturation of the heteroduplex tract.
Holliday junctions must be cleaved to produce recombinant molecules. Depending on the direction of cleavage, the resulting molecules will or will not have exchanged sequences flanking the region of heteroduplex DNA (crossing over). This step could be performed either by a Holliday junction-specific resolvase or by a topoisomerase. Resolvase activity has been identified in yeast meiotic and in mammalian testis extracts (Constantinou et al., 2001) but the corresponding protein(s) have not yet been identified. Throughout the genome, the distribution of crossovers and resulting chiasmata (the cytologically detectable manifestation of crossovers) is non-random, but each pair of homologous chromosomes must experience at least one crossover, which is probably sufficient to ensure proper segregation during the first meiotic division (Kaback, 1996). Moreover, crossovers are non-randomly distributed along chromosomes, such that a crossover at a given locus decreases the possibility of a nearby event. Little is known about the molecular basis of this phenomenon, termed "interference". Two other MutS homologs, Msh4 and Msh5 (which have no role in mismatch repair), Mlh1 and an exonuclease, Exo1, are required for normal levels of crossing over. The Msh4 homolog has been cloned in mammals but its role in chiasma formation has not yet been determined. The murine Mlh1 protein is essential for both male and female meiosis; mlh1 meiotic cells arrest before the first division and are deficient in chiasmata. Since most of the proteins that participate in meiotic DSB repair in yeast have homologs in higher eukaryotes, it is likely that the meiotic recombination pathway described for yeast is conserved throughout evolution. In addition, most of these proteins also have important roles during DSB repair in vegetatively growing cells, suggesting that there is much mechanistic overlap between meiotic and mitotic DSB repair.
Mitotic DSB repair by homologous recombination
In yeast, DSBs are repaired predominantly by HR. Although it was previously assumed that DSBs in mammalian cells were repaired mainly by non-homologous mechanisms, there is growing evidence that HR is significant for higher organisms as well (Jasin, 2000). In addition, recent results suggest that mutations in genes encoding proteins that function in HR can potentially confer a hypermutable phenotype conducive to tumorigenesis. There are several types of homologous repair: single-strand annealing, break-induced replication and gene conversion, which differ with respect to the recombinant products they yield and with respect to their genetic control (for review see (Haber, 2000). In post-replicative diploid cells, DSBs can be repaired by using either the sister chromatid or the homologous chromosome as a template, and the choice between the two is strongly regulated. During meiotic DSB repair in yeast, genetical and physical studies have shown that most repair events involve homologous chromosomes, rather than sister chromatids. In contrast, in mitosis, when the sister chromatid is available (after S-phase), cells are likely to choose it as the repair partner (Haber, 2000).
The Rad52 epistasis group
As has been shown for meiotic recombination, HR in mitotic cells |349| requires the RAD52epistasis group of proteins, which includes Rad51, Rad55, Rad57, Rad52, Rad54 and Rad59 (Sung et al., 2000). Rad50, Mre11 and Xrs2 also have an important role in non-homologous recombination as well. In yeast, the rad51, rad52 and rad54 mutations confer X-ray hypersensitivity and severe defects in meiotic and mitotic recombination (Ivanov and Haber, 1997). In vertebrates, Rad51 is a key player in cell proliferation: rad51- /- knock out mice die early in development (Lim and Hasty, 1996) and rad51-/- cell lines cannot be established (Tsuzuki et al., 1996). The depletion of Rad51 from chicken DT40 cells leads to an accumulation of chromosome breaks, cell cycle arrest and death (Sonoda et al., 1998). Human Rad51 can be seen as discrete foci in nuclei exposed to ionizing radiation or radiomimetic chemicals but not to UV irradiation. Although the yeast RAD55 and RAD57 share similarities with RAD51, mutations in these two genes confer a less pronounced phenotype. Furthermore, overexpression of RAD51can suppress defects seen in the rad55 and rad57 null mutants (Hays et al., 1995). Mammalian cells have six Rad51 homologs- Rad51B, Rad51C, Rad51D, Xrcc2, Xrcc3, and Dmc1 (Liu et al., 1998; Pittman and Schimenti, 2000; Shu et al., 1999; Takata et al., 2000). Of these, Dmc1 is expressed only meiotically and likely has no mitotic function (Dosanjh et al., 1998; Pittman et al., 1998; Yoshida et al., 1998). All of these Rad51-like proteins, however, have important roles in HR but, unlike Rad51, are not essential for cell viability. The human and yeast Rad51 proteins initiate pairing between single-stranded DNA and duplex DNA and catalyse strand exchange (reviewed in Sung et al., 2000). The in vitro reaction mediated by yeast Rad51 is stimulated by yeast Rad52, Rad54, Rad55, Rad57 and the single stranded binding protein RPA.
In yeast, RAD52 is the most essential mitotic DSB repair gene, because it is required for all three types of homologous DSB repair described above (single-strand annealing, break-induced repair and gene conversion) (Ivanov and Haber, 1997). RAD59 shares some homology with RAD52 but mutant rad59 strains are less X-ray sensitive (Bai and Symington, 1996). RAD59-mediated repair events still require the RAD52 gene product. Rad52-/- knockout mice are viable and fertile. Murine mutant stem cells are not hypersensitive to radiation although they exhibit in HR, as measured by gene targeting (Rijkers et al., 1998). This absence of a strong phenotype in mammalian cells could be due to a functional redundancy with Rad52 homologs not yet identified. Biochemical studies have shown that the yeast and human Rad52 proteins facilitate the annealing of complementary single-stranded DNAs and stimulate Rad51-mediated strand exchange, presumably by targeting Rad51 to single-stranded DNAs. In addition, Rad52 appears to bind selectively to DNA ends (Sung et al., 2000). Curiously, in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Arabidopsis thaliana, the complete genome sequence for these organisms provides no evidence of a Rad52 homolog.
The Rad54 protein is a member of the SWI2/SNF2 family of DNA dependent-ATPases which is involved in several aspects of DNA metabolism, including transcription, nucleotide excision repair, and post-replicative repair (Sung et al., 2000). Yeast rad54 mutants are more impaired in sister chromatid recombination than in interhomolog gene conversion. One possible explanation is that the RAD54 related gene, RDH54/TID1, could be specialised for inter-homolog recombination (Klein, 1997). Consistent with this proposal is the observation that animals that are homologous for a knockout of the RAD54 gene are viable and fertile but their cells are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and DSB- inducing agents (Dronkert et al., 2000; Essers et al., 1997). The efficiency of gene targeting is reduced 5- to 10-fold in rad54 cells. The Rad54 protein stimulates RAD51-mediated strand exchange (Sung et al., 2000). Based on the functions of other members of the SWI2/SNF2 family, it has been suggested that RAD54 could also be involved in remodelling chromatin for repair and recombination.
BRCA1 and BRCA2
The recent connection between HR and tumorigenesis comes from observations that Rad51 interacts with the tumor suppressor protein p53 and the two breast cancer susceptibility gene products, BRCA1 and BRCA2 (reviewed in Dasika et al., 1999). |20026| p53 plays a crucial role in linking cell cycle progression to the presence of DNA lesions. Embryos that lack both Rad51 and p53 develop further than do embryos deficient for Rad51 alone, and some double knockout animals can survive. This suggests that the failure to repair DSBs leads to death in a p53-dependent pathway. However, the nature of this interaction at the molecular level is not known.
More attention has been given to the link between Rad51 and the two BRCA proteins. Mouse BRCA1 or BRCA2 knockouts show early embryonic lethality, similar to what is seen for RAD51 knockout mice (Hakem et al., 1998; Suzuki et al., 1997). A truncated BRCA2 gene can allow embryo survival but these animals are prone to tumor development. Their cells are radiation sensitive and exhibit spontaneous chromosomal aberrations. Loss of functional Brca1 results in a slight sensitivity to radiation and DNA-damaging chemicals and a decrease in homologous gene targeting. A fraction of Rad51 colocalises with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in mitotic S-phase cells. After UV irradiation or exposure to DNA damaging agents, these three proteins relocalize to potentially active repair sites. BRCA1 is a phosphorylated target of the ATM protein, which is a sensor of DNA damaging agents (see below). BRCA1 also interacts with the Rad50/Mre11/Nbs1 complex, which is involved in both HR, mentioned above, and in NHEJ (see below). Little is known about the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2: although they could have a direct role in DSB repair, they are more likely involved in the regulation of DNA repair processes (see below).
Numerous other proteins that participate in mitotic HR have been described. Among these, Rad50, Mre11 and Xrs2 (described below in conjunction with NHEJ) have multiple functions: HR, telomere length maintenance, meiotic DSB induction, and checkpoint regulation. HR events also involve nearly all the components of the replication machinery. Mismatch repair proteins correct some of the mismatches created during repair and are involved in DSB processing in the single-strand annealing pathway. The maturation of recombination intermediates is performed by Holliday junction migration and resolution proteins.
Beyond its role in DSB repair, HR is relevant to other chromosomal maintenance processes. In yeast, in the absence of telomerase activity, the HR machinery can restore telomere length (Le et al., 1999; Nugent et al., 1998). In addition, there is growing evidence that HR has a critical role in the reinitiation of DNA synthesis at broken replication forks (Rothstein et al., 2000).
Non Homologous End Joining
NHEJ is a repair mechanism that is utilized in both lower and higher eukaryotes, as evidenced by the conservation of many of the protein components involved in the process. In mammalian cells, it is considered to be the major repair pathway since cells mutated in NHEJ components display significantly increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation. In contrast, in lower eukaryotes, such as in yeast, NHEJ is less prominent in DSB repair. Indeed, S. cerevisiae mutants with defects in NHEJ proteins display increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation only in the absence of HR. In mammalian cells, much of our recent knowledge concerning the function of NHEJ components comes from V(D)J recombination studies (for review see (Fugmann et al., 2000).
V(D)J recombination is a programmed mechanism which assembles the genes encoding immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors by fusing two or more gene segments (termed V, D and J) in developing lymphocytes. The lymphoid-specific recombination activating proteins Rag1and Rag2 initiate this reaction by creating a DSB at recombination signal sequences, which are adjacent to the V,D and J segments. This cleavage creates two types of recombination intermediate, covalently sealed (hairpin) coding ends and blunt signal ends. Signal ends are generally joined without processing, producing precise signal joints. In contrast, when hairpin coding ends are joined, terminal nucleotides are frequently lost or added, and imprecise coding joints of great variety are thereby generated. Through the analysis of DNA repair mutants it has been shown that many of the repair steps involved in the V(D)J reaction are dependent on NHEJ components.
Factors involved in NHEJ
Ku protein and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs)
The Ku protein was originally identified as an autoantigen recognized by sera from autoimmune patients. It was subsequently shown to be a DNA end-binding complex composed of a 70 kDa (Ku70) and an 80 kDa (Ku80) subunit (for review see Featherstone and Jackson, 1999). The corresponding genes in mammalian cells are XRCC5 (Ku80)and XRCC6 (Ku70). Mice containing disruptions of both of these genes have been generated and they display significant growth retardation as well as premature senescence (Gu et al., 1997a; Gu et al., 1997b; Nussenzweig et al., 1996; Zhu et al., 1996). Additionally, they are extremely sensitive to ionizing radiation and are immunodeficient, due to their inability to carry out V(D)J recombination. The S. cerevisiae Ku homolog consists of 70 and 85 kDa subunits (Hdf1 and Hdf2) that, like the mammalian heterodimer, exhibit DNA end-binding activity (Boulton and Jackson, 1996; Feldmann et al., 1996; Feldmann and Winnacker, 1993; Milne et al., 1996). Yeast Ku mutants are viable but are defective in NHEJ. However, they exhibit sensitivity to ionizing radiation only if HR is not functional (i.e., in a rad52 background).
DNA-PKcs is a 460 kDa protein with a serine/threonine protein kinase activity that can be stimulated through an interaction with DNA ends (for review see Smith and Jackson, 1999). Studies in vitro have demonstrated that potential targets for the kinase activity of DNA-PKcs include p53, c-myc, the transcription factor Sp1, RNA polymerase II and the Ku protein. The corresponding mammalian gene is XRCC7, and similar to what is observed for Ku disruptions in mice, XRCC7 mutations confer severe immunodeficiency and radiation hypersensitivity (Gao et al., 1998; Jhappan et al., 1997; Taccioli et al., 1998). However, in contrast to Ku mutants, DNA-PKcs mutants are not completely defective in V(D)J recombination. While they are unable to carry out coding joint formation, they are capable of forming signal joints at levels similar to those formed in normal mice. This result suggests that there may be some differences between the roles of DNA- PKcs and Ku in the process of NHEJ. Interestingly, in S. cerevisiae there are at present no known homologs of DNA-PKcs. Several proteins that share limited homology with DNA-PKcs (Tel1, Mec1) have been identified; however, cells containing mutations of these related proteins do not display any NHEJ defects.
In mammalian cells, the Ku heterodimer has been shown to interact with DNA-PKcs, the resulting complex being collectively referred to as DNA-PK. The Ku heterodimer is considered to be the regulatory subunit while the kinase is the catalytic component of this complex. Extensive biochemical analysis of DNA-PK suggests that, following the formation of a DSB, the Ku heterodimer binds and recruits DNA-PKcs (Yaneva et al., 1997; Yoo and Dynan, 1999) (Figure 3).
DSB repair by Non Homologous End Joining. A single Ku heterodimer binds to each free DNA end of a DSB and recruits DNA-PKcs, resulting in the formation of the DNA-PK complex. Subsequently, Xrcc4 /Ligase IV complex binds to each of the DNA ends and interacts to form a tetramer that may serve to bridge the DNA ends. Other repair proteins are likely involved in this pathway, including the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (Xrs2) complex.
Xrcc4 and DNA ligase IV
Another factor required for NHEJ is encoded by the gene XRCC4. In mammalian cells, this gene was cloned by complementation of a rodent cell line (XR-1) mutation that confers hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation, as well as defects in V(D)J recombination (Li et al., 1995). Interestingly, disruption of the gene in mice leads to embryonic lethality due to massive apopototic death in the nervous system (Gao et al., 2000). Analysis of fibroblast cell lines derived from these embryos indicate that, similar to what is observed for Ku-deficient cell lines, these cells display premature senescence, increased radiation sensitivity, and defects in V(D)J recombination. Similarly, in yeast, mutants of the XRCC4 homolog (LIF1), also have a phenotype that closely resembles that of Ku mutants: decreased levels of NHEJ as well as radiation sensitivity in the absence of HR (Herrmann et al., 1998). These results strongly suggest that XRCC4 and Ku function in the same DNA repair pathway.
XRCC4 is a ubiquitously expressed protein that appears to homodimerize. Although the amino acid sequence provides no clues as to its function, the finding that XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV suggests that it may recruit or activate ligase IV to complete the end joining reaction (Critchlow et al., 1997; Grawunder et al., 1997). Indeed, evidence of a functional interaction comes from studies showing that, similar to the effect of XRCC4 inactivation, disruption of the DNA ligase IV gene in mice leads to embryonic lethality (Barnes et al., 1998; Frank et al., 1998). However, disruption of ligase IV in an established mammalian cell line results in radiation sensitivity and a defect in V(D)J recombination (Grawunder et al., 1998). Overexpression of other DNA ligases in this cell line (DNA ligase I or III) is unable to compensate for these defects, suggesting that DNA ligase IV is the major if not only DNA ligase involved in end joining. A homolog has also been identified in S. cerevisiae (DNL4), and dnl4 mutants have been shown to have significant defects in NHEJ (Schar et al., 1997; Wilson et al., 1997).
Rad50, Mre11 and Xrs2 (Nbs1)
The Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 complex was first identified in S. cerevisiae as a factor involved in DSB repair (for review see Haber, 1998) It has been more explicitly demonstrated subsequently that this complex is involved in both HR as well as in NHEJ. Interestingly, in S. cerevisiae, the only end joining events recovered in mre11 mutants are those that do not exploit terminal homology, thus suggesting that the Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2 complex is specifically required for the use of microhomology. Mammalian Mre11 and Rad50 homologs associate with the Nbs1 protein, which is likely a functional homolog of Xrs2 in higher eukaryotes (Carney et al., 1998). A truncated form of the NBS1 gene is responsible for the human autosomal recessive disorder Nijmegan Breakage Syndrome (NBS) (Matsuura et al., 1998; Varon et al., 1998). Additionally, a truncating mutation of the MRE11 gene has been demonstrated to be at the origin of an ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T, see below) related syndrome (Stewart et al., 1999). Both of these disorders are associated with genomic instability, cancer predisposition and immunodeficiency. In contrast, studies in mice indicate that a complete disruption of MRE11, RAD50 or NBS1 results in early embryonic lethality (Luo et al., 1999; Xiao and Weaver, 1997; Zhu et al., 2001). Rad50 has been shown to be an ATP-dependent DNA binding protein (Raymond and Kleckner, 1993). Mre11 possesses several biochemical activities, the most relevant being a 3'-5' double-stranded DNA exonuclease activity that is postulated to play a role in removing damaged or mismatched DNA termini and exposing short lengths of single-stranded DNA (Paull and Gellert, 1998; Trujillo et al., 1998).
The cellular response to DNA damage
The cellular response to DSBs is a complex process that involves a network of interacting signal transduction pathways (for review see Dasika et al., 1999; Zhou and Elledge, 2000). This process is initiated by as yet unidentified proteins that detect or sense DNA damage and subsequently transmit a signal by activating a cascade of phosphorylation events. This ultimately results in the initiation of a number of cellular responses, which help to ensure the maintenance of genomic stability, including cell cycle arrest, transcriptional activation, recruitment and activation of DNA repair proteins and, in some cases, induction of cell death by apoptosis (Figure 4). The importance of this response is evidenced by the fact that mutations that alter any aspect of the process have significant effects on DSB repair. Indeed, several syndromes associated with genomic instability and cancer predisposition, such as A-T and Nijmegan breakage syndrome (NBS), involve mutations in genes that are involved in the cellular response to DNA damage.
DNA damage response (after Zhou and Elledge, 2000).
DNA damage is recognized by sensor proteins that then initiate a network of signal transduction pathways. This ultimately results in the activation of effector proteins that execute the functions of the DNA damage response, including recruitment of DNA repair proteins, cell cycle arrest, damage induced transcription, or the induction of apopotosis.
Ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) is a disease clinically characterized by progressive neurodegeneration, facial telangiectasia, immune deficiency, gonadal dysgenesis and cancer predisposition (for review see (Rotman and Shiloh, 1999). A-T cells display increased sensitivity to killing by ionizing radiation and are defective in several DNA damage-induced checkpoint controls. The product of the ATM gene (A-T mutated) belongs to a family of protein kinases that are structurally related to phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI-3)-kinases (Savitsky et al., 1995). However, the ability of ATM to function as a protein and not a lipid kinase suggests that it is involved in the signal transduction cascade that is initiated in response to DNA damage. Indeed, Atm has an important role in the response to ionizing radiation, by phosphorylating several key proteins such as p53, Mdm2, Chk1, Nbs1 and Brca1 in response to DNA damage. These phosphorylation events are, in part, responsible for the cell cycle arrest that is necessary for DSB repair. Cells in which ATM is mutated are defective in the arrest at both the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In addition, while normal cells exhibit a dose dependent inhibition of DNA synthesis following exposure to ionizing radiation, A-T cells display almost no alteration in their rates of replication.
Nijmegan breakage syndrome
NBS is characterized by clinical and cellular features that resemble AT in many respects (for review see (Shiloh, 1997). In particular NBS patients exhibit chromosome instability, immune deficiency, microencephaly and developmental delay. In addition, cells from such individuals display increased sensitivity to killing by ionizing radiation and as well as radio-resistant DNA synthesis. As previously described, the Nbs protein forms a complex with Mre11 and Rad50 that is required for the repair of DSBs by both NHEJ and HR (Carney et al., 1998). Functional analysis of this complex with immunoflourescently labeled antibodies indicates that following exposure to ionizing radiation, the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex localizes to sites of DNA damage, forming discrete nuclear foci early in the DNA damage response that remain associated with DSBs until the repair is complete (Maser et al., 1997; Mirzoeva and Petrini, 2001). Interestingly, it has recently been shown that ATM directly phosphorylates Nbs1 on several sites that are necessary for the formation of these foci (Gatei et al., 2000; Lim et al., 2000; Wu et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2000). This finding provides a functional link between ATM and Nbs1 that may explain the similar phenotypes associated with the corresponding syndromes.
The breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1
Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been an outstanding model organism for
studying the genetics and biochemistry of recombination processes. The
extensive work that has been carried out with this organism has led to
a detailed mechanistic understanding of DSB repair. The relavance of
these studies to the comprehension of DSB repair in higher eukaryotes
is supported by the significant conservation of genes involved in this
process. However, the emergence of various tumor suppressors as
potential modulators of recombination emphasizes the additional
complexity of DNA repair and its consequences in mammals. Another
recent advance in the field has been the discovery of numerous
endogenous sources of DSBs. These lesions can be generated during
specific programmed processes such as V(D)J recombination and meiosis,
as byproducts of normal cellular metabolism - for example during
replication or transcription - as well as by environmental factors
such as ionizing radiation, radiomimmetic drugs or reactive oxygen
species. Thus, DSBs are lesions with which the cell is frequently
confronted, and improper or inefficient repair can be extremely
detrimental at both the cellular and organismal levels. This is made
particularly evident by the wide-ranging defects of knockout mice
lacking important DSB repair genes and by the severity of human
diseases (i.e. Ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegan breakage syndrome)
associated with loss of function of DSB repair genes.
For comments and suggestions or contributions, please contact us
BRCA1 was initially identified as a tumor suppressor gene mutated in a significant percentage of patients with familial breast cancer and/or
Bibliography A Rad52 homolog is required for RAD51-independent mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bai Y, Symington LS Genes & development. 1996 ; 10 (16) : 2025-2037. PMID 8769646 Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Barlow C, Hirotsune S, Paylor R, Liyanage M, Eckhaus M, Collins F, Shiloh Y, Crawley JN, Ried T, Tagle D, Wynshaw-Boris A Cell. 1996 ; 86 (1) : 159-171. PMID 8689683 Targeted disruption of the gene encoding DNA ligase IV leads to lethality in embryonic mice. Barnes DE, Stamp G, Rosewell I, Denzel A, Lindahl T Current biology : CB. 1998 ; 8 (25) : 1395-1398. PMID 9889105 Chiasmata, crossovers, and meiotic chromosome segregation. Bascom-Slack CA, Ross LO, Dawson DS Advances in genetics. 1997 ; 35 : 253-284. PMID 9348650 Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S Molecular cell. 2000 ; 6 (5) : 989-998. PMID 11106739 Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. Baudat F, Nicolas A Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997 ; 94 (10) : 5213-5218. PMID 9144217 An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Bergerat A, de Massy B, Gadelle D, Varoutas PC, Nicolas A, Forterre P Nature. 1997 ; 386 (6623) : 414-417. PMID 9121560 The many faces of mismatch repair in meiosis. Borts RH, Chambers SR, Abdullah MF Mutation research. 2000 ; 451 (1-2) : 129-150. PMID 10915869 Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP Nucleic acids research. 1996 ; 24 (23) : 4639-4648. PMID 8972848 XRCC3 is required for efficient repair of chromosome breaks by homologous recombination. Brenneman MA, Weiss AE, Nickoloff JA, Chen DJ Mutation research. 2000 ; 459 (2) : 89-97. PMID 10725659 The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Carney JP, Maser RS, Olivares H, Davis EM, Le Beau M, Yates JR 3rd, Hays L, Morgan WF, Petrini JH Cell. 1998 ; 93 (3) : 477-486. PMID 9590181 Multiple roles of Spo11 in meiotic chromosome behavior. Celerin M, Merino ST, Stone JE, Menzie AM, Zolan ME The EMBO journal. 2000 ; 19 (11) : 2739-2750. PMID 10835371 Branch migration and Holliday junction resolution catalyzed by activities from mammalian cells. Constantinou A, Davies AA, West SC Cell. 2001 ; 104 (2) : 259-268. PMID 11207366 Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Cortez D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ Science (New York, N.Y.). 1999 ; 286 (5442) : 1162-1166. PMID 10550055 Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV. Critchlow SE, Bowater RP, Jackson SP Current biology : CB. 1997 ; 7 (8) : 588-598. PMID 9259561 DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints and DNA strand break repair in development and tumorigenesis. Dasika GK, Lin SC, Zhao S, Sung P, Tomkinson A, Lee EY Oncogene. 1999 ; 18 (55) : 7883-7899. PMID 10630641 Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Dernburg AF, McDonald K, Moulder G, Barstead R, Dresser M, Villeneuve AM Cell. 1998 ; 94 (3) : 387-398. PMID 9708740 Isolation and characterization of RAD51C, a new human member of the RAD51 family of related genes. Dosanjh MK, Collins DW, Fan W, Lennon GG, Albala JS, Shen Z, Schild D Nucleic acids research. 1998 ; 26 (5) : 1179-1184. PMID 9469824 Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Dronkert ML, Beverloo HB, Johnson RD, Hoeijmakers JH, Jasin M, Kanaar R Molecular and cellular biology. 2000 ; 20 (9) : 3147-3156. PMID 10757799 Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination. Essers J, Hendriks RW, Swagemakers SM, Troelstra C, de Wit J, Bootsma D, Hoeijmakers JH, Kanaar R Cell. 1997 ; 89 (2) : 195-204. PMID 9108475 Ku, a DNA repair protein with multiple cellular functions? Featherstone C, Jackson SP Mutation research. 1999 ; 434 (1) : 3-15. PMID 10377944 HDF2, the second subunit of the Ku homologue from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Feldmann H, Driller L, Meier B, Mages G, Kellermann J, Winnacker EL The Journal of biological chemistry. 1996 ; 271 (44) : 27765-27769. PMID 8910371 A putative homologue of the human autoantigen Ku from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Feldmann H, Winnacker EL The Journal of biological chemistry. 1993 ; 268 (17) : 12895-12900. PMID 8509423 Late embryonic lethality and impaired V(D)J recombination in mice lacking DNA ligase IV. Frank KM, Sekiguchi JM, Seidl KJ, Swat W, Rathbun GA, Cheng HL, Davidson L, Kangaloo L, Alt FW Nature. 1998 ; 396 (6707) : 173-177. PMID 9823897 DNA Repair and Mutagenesis Friedberg E C, Walker G C, Siede W (Washington, D. C., ASM Press). 1995. Ultraviolet and gamma-ray-induced free-radical reactions of nucleic acid constituents. Selectivity of some reactions for purines. Suppression of the reactivity of pyrimidines. Frimer AA, Havron A, Leonov D, Sperling J, Elad D Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1976 ; 98 (19) : 6026-6033. PMID 965637 The RAG proteins and V(D)J recombination: complexes, ends, and transposition. Fugmann SD, Lee AI, Shockett PE, Villey IJ, Schatz DG Annual review of immunology. 2000 ; 18 : 495-527. PMID 10837067 A targeted DNA-PKcs-null mutation reveals DNA-PK-independent functions for KU in V(D)J recombination. Gao Y, Chaudhuri J, Zhu C, Davidson L, Weaver DT, Alt FW Immunity. 1998 ; 9 (3) : 367-376. PMID 9768756 Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Gao Y, Ferguson DO, Xie W, Manis JP, Sekiguchi J, Frank KM, Chaudhuri J, Horner J, DePinho RA, Alt FW Nature. 2000 ; 404 (6780) : 897-900. PMID 10786799 ATM-dependent phosphorylation of nibrin in response to radiation exposure. Gatei M, Young D, Cerosaletti KM, Desai-Mehta A, Spring K, Kozlov S, Lavin MF, Gatti RA, Concannon P, Khanna K Nature genetics. 2000 ; 25 (1) : 115-119. PMID 10802669 Inaugural article: global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gerton JL, DeRisi J, Shroff R, Lichten M, Brown PO, Petes TD Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000 ; 97 (21) : 11383-11390. PMID 11027339 Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells. Grawunder U, Wilm M, Wu X, Kulesza P, Wilson TE, Mann M, Lieber MR Nature. 1997 ; 388 (6641) : 492-495. PMID 9242410 DNA ligase IV is essential for V(D)J recombination and DNA double-strand break repair in human precursor lymphocytes. Grawunder U, Zimmer D, Fugmann S, Schwarz K, Lieber MR Molecular cell. 1998 ; 2 (4) : 477-484. PMID 9809069 AtSPO11-1 is necessary for efficient meiotic recombination in plants. Grelon M, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Pelletier G The EMBO journal. 2001 ; 20 (3) : 589-600. PMID 11157765 Ku70-deficient embryonic stem cells have increased ionizing radiosensitivity, defective DNA end-binding activity, and inability to support V(D)J recombination. Gu Y, Jin S, Gao Y, Weaver DT, Alt FW Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997 ; 94 (15) : 8076-8081. PMID 9223317 Growth retardation and leaky SCID phenotype of Ku70-deficient mice. Gu Y, Seidl KJ, Rathbun GA, Zhu C, Manis JP, van der Stoep N, Davidson L, Cheng HL, Sekiguchi JM, Frank K, Stanhope-Baker P, Schlissel MS, Roth DB, Alt FW Immunity. 1997 ; 7 (5) : 653-665. PMID 9390689 The many interfaces of Mre11. Haber JE Cell. 1998 ; 95 (5) : 583-586. PMID 9845359 Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break. Haber JE Trends in genetics : TIG. 2000 ; 16 (6) : 259-264. PMID 10827453 Developmental studies of Brca1 and Brca2 knock-out mice. Hakem R, de la Pompa JL, Mak TW Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia. 1998 ; 3 (4) : 431-445. PMID 10819537 Complex formation in yeast double-strand break repair: participation of Rad51, Rad52, Rad55, and Rad57 proteins. Hays SL, Firmenich AA, Berg P Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1995 ; 92 (15) : 6925-6929. PMID 7624345 Saccharomyces cerevisiae LIF1: a function involved in DNA double-strand break repair related to mammalian XRCC4. Herrmann G, Lindahl T, Schär P The EMBO journal. 1998 ; 17 (14) : 4188-4198. PMID 9670033 DNA repair: RAD alert. Ivanov EL, Haber JE Current biology : CB. 1997 ; 7 (8) : R492-R495. PMID 9259545 Characterization of the role played by the RAD59 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ectopic recombination. Jablonovich Z, Liefshitz B, Steinlauf R, Kupiec M Current genetics. 1999 ; 36 (1-2) : 13-20. PMID 10447590 Chromosome breaks and genomic instability. Jasin M Cancer investigation. 2000 ; 18 (1) : 78-86. PMID 10701370 DNA-PKcs: a T-cell tumour suppressor encoded at the mouse scid locus. Jhappan C, Morse HC 3rd, Fleischmann RD, Gottesman MM, Merlino G Nature genetics. 1997 ; 17 (4) : 483-486. PMID 9398856 Mammalian XRCC2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Johnson RD, Liu N, Jasin M Nature. 1999 ; 401 (6751) : 397-399. PMID 10517641 Chromosome-size dependent control of meiotic recombination in humans. Kaback DB Nature genetics. 1996 ; 13 (1) : 20-21. PMID 8673097 DNA double strand break repair in mammalian cells. Karran P Current opinion in genetics & development. 2000 ; 10 (2) : 144-150. PMID 10753787 A mouse homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic recombination DNA transesterase Spo11p. Keeney S, Baudat F, Angeles M, Zhou ZH, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Manova K, Jasin M Genomics. 1999 ; 61 (2) : 170-182. PMID 10534402 Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N Cell. 1997 ; 88 (3) : 375-384. PMID 9039264 Meiosis: how could it work? Kleckner N Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996 ; 93 (16) : 8167-8174. PMID 8710842 RDH54, a RAD54 homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mitotic diploid-specific recombination and repair and for meiosis. Klein HL Genetics. 1997 ; 147 (4) : 1533-1543. PMID 9409819 Loss of constitutional heterozygosity in human cancer. Lasko D, Cavenee W, Nordenskjö M Annual review of genetics. 1991 ; 25 : 281-314. PMID 1687498 RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. Le S, Moore JK, Haber JE, Greider CW Genetics. 1999 ; 152 (1) : 143-152. PMID 10224249 hCds1-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates the DNA damage response. Lee JS, Collins KM, Brown AL, Lee CH, Chung JH Nature. 2000 ; 404 (6774) : 201-204. PMID 10724175 Tying up loose ends: nonhomologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lewis LK, Resnick MA Mutation research. 2000 ; 451 (1-2) : 71-89. PMID 10915866 Binding of CtIP to the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 involved in the transcription regulation of p21 is disrupted upon DNA damage. Li S, Chen PL, Subramanian T, Chinnadurai G, Tomlinson G, Osborne CK, Sharp ZD, Lee WH The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999 ; 274 (16) : 11334-11338. PMID 10196224 The XRCC4 gene encodes a novel protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination. Li Z, Otevrel T, Gao Y, Cheng HL, Seed B, Stamato TD, Taccioli GE, Alt FW Cell. 1995 ; 83 (7) : 1079-1089. PMID 8548796 A mutation in mouse rad51 results in an early embryonic lethal that is suppressed by a mutation in p53. Lim DS, Hasty P Molecular and cellular biology. 1996 ; 16 (12) : 7133-7143. PMID 8943369 ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Lim DS, Kim ST, Xu B, Maser RS, Lin J, Petrini JH, Kastan MB Nature. 2000 ; 404 (6778) : 613-617. PMID 10766245 XRCC2 and XRCC3, new human Rad51-family members, promote chromosome stability and protect against DNA cross-links and other damages. Liu N, Lamerdin JE, Tebbs RS, Schild D, Tucker JD, Shen MR, Brookman KW, Siciliano MJ, Walter CA, Fan W, Narayana LS, Zhou ZQ, Adamson AW, Sorensen KJ, Chen DJ, Jones NJ, Thompson LH Molecular cell. 1998 ; 1 (6) : 783-793. PMID 9660962 Disruption of mRad50 causes embryonic stem cell lethality, abnormal embryonic development, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Luo G, Yao MS, Bender CF, Mills M, Bladl AR, Bradley A, Petrini JH Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999 ; 96 (13) : 7376-7381. PMID 10377422 hMre11 and hRad50 nuclear foci are induced during the normal cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Maser RS, Monsen KJ, Nelms BE, Petrini JH Molecular and cellular biology. 1997 ; 17 (10) : 6087-6096. PMID 9315668 Positional cloning of the gene for Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Matsuura S, Tauchi H, Nakamura A, Kondo N, Sakamoto S, Endo S, Smeets D, Solder B, Belohradsky BH, Der Kaloustian VM, Oshimura M, Isomura M, Nakamura Y, Komatsu K Nature genetics. 1998 ; 19 (2) : 179-181. PMID 9620777 mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved. McKim KS, Hayashi-Hagihara A Genes & development. 1998 ; 12 (18) : 2932-2942. PMID 9744869 Identification and characterization of an SPO11 homolog in the mouse. Metzler-Guillemain C, de Massy B Chromosoma. 2000 ; 109 (1-2) : 133-138. PMID 10855504 Mutations in two Ku homologs define a DNA end-joining repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Milne GT, Jin S, Shannon KB, Weaver DT Molecular and cellular biology. 1996 ; 16 (8) : 4189-4198. PMID 8754818 DNA damage-dependent nuclear dynamics of the Mre11 complex. Mirzoeva OK, Petrini JH Molecular and cellular biology. 2001 ; 21 (1) : 281-288. PMID 11113202 Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks. Nugent CI, Bosco G, Ross LO, Evans SK, Salinger AP, Moore JK, Haber JE, Lundblad V Current biology : CB. 1998 ; 8 (11) : 657-660. PMID 9635193 Requirement for Ku80 in growth and immunoglobulin V(D)J recombination. Nussenzweig A, Chen C, da Costa Soares V, Sanchez M, Sokol K, Nussenzweig MC, Li GC Nature. 1996 ; 382 (6591) : 551-555. PMID 8700231 Hypersensitivity of Ku80-deficient cell lines and mice to DNA damage: the effects of ionizing radiation on growth, survival, and development. Nussenzweig A, Sokol K, Burgman P, Li L, Li GC Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997 ; 94 (25) : 13588-13593. PMID 9391070 Similarity of the yeast RAD51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Ogawa T, Yu X, Shinohara A, Egelman EH Science (New York, N.Y.). 1993 ; 259 (5103) : 1896-1899. PMID 8456314 Similarity of the yeast RAD51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Ogawa T, Yu X, Shinohara A, Egelman EH Science (New York, N.Y.). 1993 ; 259 (5103) : 1896-1899. PMID 8456314 The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Paull TT, Gellert M Molecular cell. 1998 ; 1 (7) : 969-979. PMID 9651580 XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Pierce AJ, Johnson RD, Thompson LH, Jasin M Genes & development. 1999 ; 13 (20) : 2633-2638. PMID 10541549 Meiotic prophase arrest with failure of chromosome synapsis in mice deficient for Dmc1, a germline-specific RecA homolog. Pittman DL, Cobb J, Schimenti KJ, Wilson LA, Cooper DM, Brignull E, Handel MA, Schimenti JC Molecular cell. 1998 ; 1 (5) : 697-705. PMID 9660953 Midgestation lethality in mice deficient for the RecA-related gene, Rad51d/Rad51l3. Pittman DL, Schimenti JC Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000). 2000 ; 26 (3) : 167-173. PMID 10705376 RAD50 protein of S.cerevisiae exhibits ATP-dependent DNA binding. Raymond WE, Kleckner N Nucleic acids research. 1993 ; 21 (16) : 3851-3856. PMID 8367302 Targeted inactivation of mouse RAD52 reduces homologous recombination but not resistance to ionizing radiation. Rijkers T, Van Den Ouweland J, Morolli B, Rolink AG, Baarends WM, Van Sloun PP, Lohman PH, Pastink A Molecular and cellular biology. 1998 ; 18 (11) : 6423-6429. PMID 9774658 Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Roeder GS Genes & development. 1997 ; 11 (20) : 2600-2621. PMID 9334324 The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD Molecular cell. 2000 ; 6 (5) : 975-987. PMID 11106738 Cloning, characterization, and localization of mouse and human SPO11. Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD Genomics. 1999 ; 61 (2) : 156-169. PMID 10534401 Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Rothstein R, Michel B, Gangloff S Genes & development. 2000 ; 14 (1) : 1-10. PMID 10640269 ATM: a mediator of multiple responses to genotoxic stress. Rotman G, Shiloh Y Oncogene. 1999 ; 18 (45) : 6135-6144. PMID 10557105 recA-like genes from three archaean species with putative protein products similar to Rad51 and Dmc1 proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sandler SJ, Satin LH, Samra HS, Clark AJ Nucleic acids research. 1996 ; 24 (11) : 2125-2132. PMID 8668545 A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Savitsky K, Bar-Shira A, Gilad S, Rotman G, Ziv Y, Vanagaite L, Tagle DA, Smith S, Uziel T, Sfez S, Ashkenazi M, Pecker I, Frydman M, Harnik R, Patanjali SR, Simmons A, Clines GA, Sartiel A, Gatti RA, Chessa L, Sanal O, Lavin MF, Jaspers NG, Taylor AM, Arlett CF, Miki T, Weissman SM, Lovett M, Collins FS, Shiloh Y Science (New York, N.Y.). 1995 ; 268 (5218) : 1749-1753. PMID 7792600 A newly identified DNA ligase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in RAD52-independent repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Schär P, Herrmann G, Daly G, Lindahl T Genes & development. 1997 ; 11 (15) : 1912-1924. PMID 9271115 Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Schwacha A, Kleckner N Cell. 1994 ; 76 (1) : 51-63. PMID 8287479 In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Scully R, Livingston DM Nature. 2000 ; 408 (6811) : 429-432. PMID 11100717 Differential gene expression of mammalian SPO11/TOP6A homologs during meiosis. Shannon M, Richardson L, Christian A, Handel MA, Thelen MP FEBS letters. 1999 ; 462 (3) : 329-334. PMID 10622720 Ataxia-telangiectasia and the Nijmegen breakage syndrome: related disorders but genes apart. Shiloh Y Annual review of genetics. 1997 ; 31 : 635-662. PMID 9442910 Disruption of muREC2/RAD51L1 in mice results in early embryonic lethality which can Be partially rescued in a p53(-/-) background. Shu Z, Smith S, Wang L, Rice MC, Kmiec EB Molecular and cellular biology. 1999 ; 19 (12) : 8686-8693. PMID 10567591 The DNA-dependent protein kinase. Smith GC, Jackson SP Genes & development. 1999 ; 13 (8) : 916-934. PMID 10215620 Recombination at work for meiosis. Smith KN, Nicolas A Current opinion in genetics & development. 1998 ; 8 (2) : 200-211. PMID 9610411 Rad51-deficient vertebrate cells accumulate chromosomal breaks prior to cell death. Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, Buerstedde JM, Bezzubova O, Shinohara A, Ogawa H, Takata M, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Takeda S The EMBO journal. 1998 ; 17 (2) : 598-608. PMID 9430650 The DNA double-strand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder. Stewart GS, Maser RS, Stankovic T, Bressan DA, Kaplan MI, Jaspers NG, Raams A, Byrd PJ, Petrini JH, Taylor AM Cell. 1999 ; 99 (6) : 577-587. PMID 10612394 Recombination factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sung P, Trujillo KM, Van Komen S Mutation research. 2000 ; 451 (1-2) : 257-275. PMID 10915877 Brca2 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Suzuki A, de la Pompa JL, Hakem R, Elia A, Yoshida R, Mo R, Nishina H, Chuang T, Wakeham A, Itie A, Koo W, Billia P, Ho A, Fukumoto M, Hui CC, Mak TW Genes & development. 1997 ; 11 (10) : 1242-1252. PMID 9171369 The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Szostak JW, Orr-Weaver TL, Rothstein RJ, Stahl FW Cell. 1983 ; 33 (1) : 25-35. PMID 6380756 Targeted disruption of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-PK gene in mice confers severe combined immunodeficiency and radiosensitivity. Taccioli GE, Amatucci AG, Beamish HJ, Gell D, Xiang XH, Torres Arzayus MI, Priestley A, Jackson SP, Marshak Rothstein A, Jeggo PA, Herrera VL Immunity. 1998 ; 9 (3) : 355-366. PMID 9768755 The Rad51 paralog Rad51B promotes homologous recombinational repair. Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E, Fukushima T, Morrison C, Albala JS, Swagemakers SM, Kanaar R, Thompson LH, Takeda S Molecular and cellular biology. 2000 ; 20 (17) : 6476-6482. PMID 10938124 Mouse homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae spo11 is induced in normal mu(+)B-cells by stimuli that cause germline C(H) transcription and subsequent class switch recombination. Tokuyama H, Tokuyama Y Cellular immunology. 2000 ; 202 (1) : 1-5. PMID 10873300 Nuclease activities in a complex of human recombination and DNA repair factors Rad50, Mre11, and p95. Trujillo KM, Yuan SS, Lee EY, Sung P The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998 ; 273 (34) : 21447-21450. PMID 9705271 Targeted disruption of the Rad51 gene leads to lethality in embryonic mice. Tsuzuki T, Fujii Y, Sakumi K, Tominaga Y, Nakao K, Sekiguchi M, Matsushiro A, Yoshimura Y, MoritaT Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996 ; 93 (13) : 6236-6240. PMID 8692798 Nibrin, a novel DNA double-strand break repair protein, is mutated in Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Varon R, Vissinga C, Platzer M, Cerosaletti KM, Chrzanowska KH, Saar K, Beckmann G, Seemanov´ E, Cooper PR, Nowak NJ, Stumm M, Weemaes CM, Gatti RA, Wilson RK, Digweed M, Rosenthal A, Sperling K, Concannon P, Reis A Cell. 1998 ; 93 (3) : 467-476. PMID 9590180 BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Wang Y, Cortez D, Yazdi P, Neff N, Elledge SJ, Qin J Genes & development. 2000 ; 14 (8) : 927-939. PMID 10783165 Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining. Wilson TE, Grawunder U, Lieber MR Nature. 1997 ; 388 (6641) : 495-498. PMID 9242411 ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Wu X, Ranganathan V, Weisman DS, Heine WF, Ciccone DN, O'Neill TB, Crick KE, Pierce KA, Lane WS, Rathbun G, Livingston DM, Weaver DT Nature. 2000 ; 405 (6785) : 477-482. PMID 10839545 Conditional gene targeted deletion by Cre recombinase demonstrates the requirement for the double-strand break repair Mre11 protein in murine embryonic stem cells. Xiao Y, Weaver DT Nucleic acids research. 1997 ; 25 (15) : 2985-2991. PMID 9224597 Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Xu Y, Ashley T, Brainerd EE, Bronson RT, Meyn MS, Baltimore D Genes & development. 1996 ; 10 (19) : 2411-2422. PMID 8843194 Interaction of DNA-dependent protein kinase with DNA and with Ku: biochemical and atomic-force microscopy studies. Yaneva M, Kowalewski T, Lieber MR The EMBO journal. 1997 ; 16 (16) : 5098-5112. PMID 9305651 Geometry of a complex formed by double strand break repair proteins at a single DNA end: recruitment of DNA-PKcs induces inward translocation of Ku protein. Yoo S, Dynan WS Nucleic acids research. 1999 ; 27 (24) : 4679-4686. PMID 10572166 The mouse RecA-like gene Dmc1 is required for homologous chromosome synapsis during meiosis. Yoshida K, Kondoh G, Matsuda Y, Habu T, Nishimune Y, Morita T Molecular cell. 1998 ; 1 (5) : 707-718. PMID 9660954 Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products. Zhao S, Weng YC, Yuan SS, Lin YT, Hsu HC, Lin SC, Gerbino E, Song MH, Zdzienicka MZ, Gatti RA, Shay JW, Ziv Y, Shiloh Y, Lee EY Nature. 2000 ; 405 (6785) : 473-477. PMID 10839544 The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Zhou BB, Elledge SJ Nature. 2000 ; 408 (6811) : 433-439. PMID 11100718 Ku86-deficient mice exhibit severe combined immunodeficiency and defective processing of V(D)J recombination intermediates. Zhu C, Bogue MA, Lim DS, Hasty P, Roth DB Cell. 1996 ; 86 (3) : 379-389. PMID 8756720 Targeted disruption of the Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene NBS1 leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Zhu J, Petersen S, Tessarollo L, Nussenzweig A Current biology : CB. 2001 ; 11 (2) : 105-109. PMID 11231126 Written 2001-04 Julianne Smith, Kathleen Smith, Christine Mézard 218 du CNRS, Institut Curie, Section de Recherche, Paris 75248, cedex05, France Citation This paper should be referenced as such : Smith, J ; Smith, K ; M_zard, C Tying up loose ends: Generation, repair of DNA double-strand breaks Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. 2001;5(3):222-235. Free journal version : [ pdf ] [ DOI ] On line version : http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org/Deep/DoubleStrandBreaksID20008.htm
© Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology indexed on : Tue Mar 14 13:57:58 CET 2017
Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been an outstanding model organism for studying the genetics and biochemistry of recombination processes. The extensive work that has been carried out with this organism has led to a detailed mechanistic understanding of DSB repair. The relavance of these studies to the comprehension of DSB repair in higher eukaryotes is supported by the significant conservation of genes involved in this process. However, the emergence of various tumor suppressors as potential modulators of recombination emphasizes the additional complexity of DNA repair and its consequences in mammals. Another recent advance in the field has been the discovery of numerous endogenous sources of DSBs. These lesions can be generated during specific programmed processes such as V(D)J recombination and meiosis, as byproducts of normal cellular metabolism - for example during replication or transcription - as well as by environmental factors such as ionizing radiation, radiomimmetic drugs or reactive oxygen species. Thus, DSBs are lesions with which the cell is frequently confronted, and improper or inefficient repair can be extremely detrimental at both the cellular and organismal levels. This is made particularly evident by the wide-ranging defects of knockout mice lacking important DSB repair genes and by the severity of human diseases (i.e. Ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegan breakage syndrome) associated with loss of function of DSB repair genes.
For comments and suggestions or contributions, please contact us