Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology


Home   Genes    Leukemias    Solid Tumors    Cancer-Prone    Deep Insight    Case Reports    Journals   Portal    Teaching   

X Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NA
    

LINE-1-encoded Reverse Transcriptase in the genesis and therapy of cancer

LINE-1-encoded Reverse Transcriptase in the genesis and therapy of cancer

Ilaria Sciamanna1, Annalucia Serafino 2, Corrado Spadafora 2

1Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
2Institute of Translational Pharmacology, CNR,
Rome, Italy; corrado.spadafora@gmail.com

   

June 2017

   

Abstract

Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINE-1) make up a large family of autonomous retrotransposons, accounting for about 17% of the human genome. They constitute the major source of non telomeric Reverse Transcriptase (RT), an essential component of the retrotransposition machinery. Expression of RT-encoding LINE-1 sequences is low in differentiated, non-pathological cells and highly active in early embryos, germ cells and in a broad spectrum of cancers.
Growing evidence functionally implicate RT in control of cell growth and differentiation and suggest causative roles in cancer onset. Indeed, inhibition of RT activity reduces proliferation, promotes differentiation and antagonizes cancer progression in animal models. More recently, RT inhibition proved effective in a phase II clinical trial with metastatic prostate cancer patients. Furthermore, the LINE-1-encoded ORF2p product, ecompassing the RT-encoding sequence, was found to be already esxpressed in precancerous lesions, increasing in progressive stages, while being undetectable in normal tissues. RT emerges therefore as a promising therapeutic target and a potential marker for early cancer detection. At the molecular level, the inhibition of LINE-1-encoded RT yields a global reprogramming of the gene expression profile in cancer cells, involving all RNA classes: coding mRNAs, long and small non-coding transcripts, including miRNAs - some of which are themselevs key players in cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis. In summary, the LINE-1-encoded RT emerges as a key component of a genome-wide regulatory mechanism that is active in embryogenesis, repressed during cell differentiation, and aberrantly reactivated in cancer cells.

Introduction

A striking, unexpected finding from the Human Genome Project was that protein-coding genes account for a mere 1.2% of the genome, while the vast majority is constituted by a heterogeneous array of non-coding sequences (International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2001; Waterston et al., 2002). That finding challenged the predominant "gene-centric" view in cancer research and represented a historical and scientific turning point: thereafter, the non-coding genome was no longer regarded as a useless genomic burden, but as a new component with potentially relevant informational content, albeit of unclear function(s). The findings that: i) approximately 80% of the genome, essentially constituted by “dark matter” (Clark et al., 2013), is pervasively transcribed (Djebali et al., 2012), and ii) a relevant fraction of these transcripts has roles in regulating genome functions, progressively strengthened the newly emerging view.

Nearly 50% of the “dark matter” is constituted by families of retrotransposable elements. Among those, LINE-1 (long interspersed nuclear elements), HERV (human endogenous retroviruses), Alu and SVA (SINE-R-VNTR-Alu; SINE, small interspersed nuclear elements; VNTR, variable number tandem repeats) are most abundant (reviewed by Goodier and Kazazian, 2008). These elements mobilize via a “copy-and-paste” mechanism that uses a reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme to reverse-transcribe RNA intermediates into cDNA copies, which then integrate in several possible genomic sites.

LINE-1s and HERVs encode their own RT and are autonomously replicating elements; in contrast, Alus and SVA do not code for RT and use the RT provided by LINE-1 for their mobilization (Levin and Moran, 2011). The LINE-1 family is the major source of the RT activity required for the overall retrotransposition activity in human cells (Brouha et al., 2003). The human genome contains about 5x105 copies of LINE-1 sequences (Fig. 1A), comprising:

  • a 5’ untranslated region (UTR) that functions as an internal promoter,
  • two open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2), separated by a short intergenic region; ORF1 codes for an RNA-binding protein, while ORF2 codes for a protein product (ORF2p) of about 150 KDa, endowed with endonuclese (EN) and reverse transcriptase (RT) activities (Alish et al., 2006);
  • a short 3’ UTR.

    In the human genome, only a sub-population of about 80-100 LINE-1 elements maintain an intact full-length sequence of 6.0 kb, and are able to retrotranspose (Brouha et al., 2003). Most LINE-1 copies are instead truncated copies that miss 5’ portions of variable length and are therefore unable to retrotranspose. These truncated elements, albeit not mobile, still maintain their transcriptional ability, making the ORF2-coding region the most abundant protein-encoding sequence compared to any other gene.

    The RT-containing ORF2p product is expressed in cellular contexts characterized by a high proliferation rate and a low differentiation level, two conditions found in early embryos and cancer cells, both characterized by low levels of DNA methylation (Dean et al., 2003; Gaudet et al., 2003; Miousse and Koturbash, 2015). In contrast, differentiated somatic cells and tissues offer poorly favourable environments for LINE-1 expression (Shi et al., 2007), where LINE-1s are epigenetically suppressed or expressed only at basal level, with the exception of brain tissues that escape this general rule (Coufal et al., 2009). The functional roles of LINE-1 expression in embryogenesis are discussed elsewhere (reviewed by Sciamanna et al., 2011; Spadafora, 2015). Here we focus on roles of LINE-1 retrotransposons in tumorigenesis and their therapeutic and diagnostic implications.

    Figure 1. LINE-1 ORF2p product is overexpressed in human cancer. A: Structure of the human LINE-1 retroelement. 5’-UTR and 3’-UTR, untranslated regions; ORF1 and ORF2, open reading frames 1 and 2; the polycitronic ORF2 encompasses regions encoding EN, endonuclease (EN), reverse transcriptase (RT) and cystein-rich (C) domains. The black box represents the intergenic spacer between the two ORFs. SP, sense promoter; ASP, anti-sense promoter. B: Immunohistochemical staining of ORF2p in human bioptic samples form normal and cancer tissues. Representative tissue sections from: normal colonic mucosa, normal prostatic gland, normal lung epithelium, normal breast (leftmost column) and respective carcinomas (right column).

    LINE-1 activation in cancer

    A growing body of evidence now supports a direct correlation between LINE-1 activation and tumorigenesis. Concomitant with the overall genomic hypomethylation typical of cancer cells and tissues (Gaudet et al., 2003; Miousse and Koturbash, 2015), LINE-1 function is resumed in cancer, and fuels bursts of retrotransposal insertions in the host genome, as tipically observed in the progression of a variety of cancers. Indeed, the development of high-throughput technologies has enabled the identification and fine localization of de novo somatic LINE-1 insertions in the genome of many types of cancer, i.e.:

  • lung (Iskow et al., 2010),
  • colorectal (Lee et al., 2012),
  • prostate (Lee et al., 2012),
  • multiple myeloma (Lee et al., 2012),
  • glioblastoma (Lee et al., 2012),
  • hepatoma (Shukla et al., 2013),
  • esophagus (Doucet-O'Hare et al., 2015),
  • colorectal (Solyom et al., 2012),
  • pancreas (Rodic et al., 2015),
  • gastric (Ewing et al., 2015),
  • ovary (Lee et al., 2012; Tang et al., 2017).

    Tumors therefore provide highly permissive environments for retrotransposition. It has long remained unclear, however, whether the new insertions are “driver” mutations that actually promote tumorigenesis, or whether they are acompanying “passenger” mutations (Rodic and Burns, 2013). A causative effect of LINE-1 insertional mutagenesis has been shown only in a limited number of breast (Morse et al., 1988) and colon cancer (Miki et al., 1992). Thus, most retrotransposition events appear to arise in consequence of a global deregulation caused by cancer, rather than being the causes.

    Nevertheless, increasing evidence indicate that high LINE-1 activity has roles in cancer, independent on the mutagenic effects of retrotranpsoisition. It is indeed well established that increased expression of LINE-1 is associated with transformed cells and tissues, i.e. mouse embryonal carcinoma cells (Martin, 1991; Martin and Branciforte, 1993) and testicular cancer (Bratthauer and Fanning, 1992). More recently, we have shown that:
    i) RT-containing ORF2p is expressed in human breast, lung, prostate and colon cancer tissues (Fig. 1B), and in melanoma (A-375), glioblastoma (U-87), colon (HT-29), small cell lung carcinoma (H-69), pancreas (BxPC-3) and prostate (LnCAP, PC-3, DU145) carcinoma cell lines (De Luca et al., 2016);
    ii) an abundant RT enzymatic activity (Mangiacasale et al., 2003; Landriscina et al., 2005) is detectable in cancer cell lines, i.e. leukemia (NB4, R4, Kasumi-1, HL60), osteosarcoma (Saos-2), breast (MDA-231, MCF7), glioma (U-343 Mg), colon (HT-29) and thyroid (ARO, FRO); and
    iii) RT activity increases during breast cancer progression in the transgenic murine model MMTV-PyVT (Gualtieri et al., 2013).

    In parallel, LINE-1 ORF1p expression is a hallmark of colon, renal, hepatocellular, lung, breast, pancreatic, and biliary tract carcinomas, pediatric malignant germ cell and of lymphoma (Rodic et al., 2014; Su et al., 2007). Interestingly, nuclear localization of ORF1p (Harris et al., 2010), or of both ORF1p and ORF2p (Chen et al., 2012a), was associated with poor prognostic outcome breast cancer. Finally, overexpression of LINE-1 endonuclease domain (EN) is associated with gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis (Wang et al., 2013). Together, these findings gradually shifted the focus away from the mutagenic potential of retrotranspositional genomic insertions, rather highlighting the importance of LINE-1 expression in tumorigenesis.

    LINE-1-encoded Reverse Transcriptase as a therapeutic target

    a) Studies in model cancer cell lines

    A functional link between LINE-1-encoded RT activity and cancer emerged clearly after the finding that RT inhibitors limit cancer cell growth. Our group first discovered that pharmacological inhibition of RT with non-nucleosidic RT inhibitors (NNRTi), nevirapine or efavirenz, reduces proliferation and promotes differentiation in a variety of histologically unrelated model cancer cell lines, i.e.:

  • osteosarcoma Saos-2 and fibrosarcoma L929 (Mangiacasale et al. 2003)
  • breast MCF7 (hormone-responsive) and MDA-231 (hormone-independent) carcinomas, which display very different sensitivty to several chemotherapics (Mangiacasale et al. 2003; Sciamanna et al. 2005)
  • prostate PC3 (Sciamanna et al. 2005)
  • colon carcinoma HT-29 (Mangiacasale et al. 2003; Sciamanna et al. 2005)
  • small cell lung carcinoma H-69 (Sciamanna et al. 2005)
  • glioma U-343 Mg (Mangiacasale et al. 2003)
  • melanoma A-375 (Sciamanna et al. 2005) and Me30966 (Lugini et al. 2016) cell lines
  • thyroid ARO and FRO cell lines (Landriscina et al. 2005 Dong et al., 2013)
  • pancreas BxPC-3 and Panc-1 cell lines (Hecht et al. 2013 Hecht et al. 2015)
  • cervix carcinoma HeLa (Stefanidis et al 2008)

    RT inhbitors were also found to induce apoptosis in some leukemia cell lines, i.e. IM9, HL60 and Jurkat (Bruning et al. 2017). Furthermore, they promote differentiation, elicited by typical morphological variations and re-expression of specific differentiation markers in:

  • melanoma (A-375), upregulation E-caderin (Sciamanna et al. 2005),
  • prostate (PC3), upregulation PS-A antigen (Sciamanna et al. 2005),
  • thyroid (ARO, FRO), upregulation thyrotropin (TSH) receptor and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) (Landriscina et al. 2006; Modoni et al. 2007; Landriscina et al. 2008; Landriscina et al. 2009; Dong et al., 2013),
  • breast (MCF7, T47D, SKBR3, Hs578T, BT20, HBL100, and MDA-MB-231 cell lines), downregulation of many genes involved in proliferation and invasion, upregulation of genes involved in the differentiation processes (Patnala et al. 2014).

    When the RT tretament was discontinued, cells reverted to their original condition, indicating that the traits induced by RT inhibitors are dependent on continued exposure to the treatment and are otherwise fully reversible (Sciamanna et al., 2005). RT inhibitors have no significant effect on healthy, non-expressing RT cells (Sciamanna et al. 2013; Bruning et al. 2017).

    b) Animal models

    Efavirenz shows anticancer therapeutic effectiveness in vivo in nude mouse models xenografted with human cell lines (Sciamanna et al., 2005):

  • melanoma A-375,
  • prostate PC3,
  • colon HT29, and
  • non small lung cell carcinoma H-69.

    Treatment of the xengrafted animals with efavirenz antagonized tumor progression, though the latter was resumed upon discontinuation of the treatment, consistent with the effects observed in cell lines. These results indicate that an RT-dependent tumor-promoting mechanism plays a key role in the onset and progression of cancer. The mechanism is antagonized by RT inhibitory drugs. Finally, the observation that RT-dependent tumorigenesis can be regarded as a fully reversible process suggests an epigenetic level of control.

    Remarkably, transient (Sciamanna et al. 2005) or stably induced (Oricchio et al. 2007) down-regulation of LINE-1 expression via RNA interference (RNAi) in A-375 melanoma cells reduced proliferation and promoted differentiation, reproducing the same effects observed with RT inhibitory drugs. In addition, LINE-1 silencing drastically reduced the tumorigenic potential of A-375 melanoma cells inoculated in nude mice (Oricchio et al. 2007). These findings therefore:

    i) suggest a causative role of LINE-1-encoded RT in tumorigenesis,
    ii) strengthen the finding that NNRTIs antoagonize cancer by specifically targeting RT,
    iii) point out that that RT is a promising target for a novel cancer therapy associated with re-differentiation of the cancer cells.

    The anticancer efficacy of RT inhibitors has recently been tested in clinical therapy. A small size phase-II trial on patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer confirmed the anticancer effectiveness of efavirenz, assessed by PSA non-progression, in a subgroup of patients in which the drug hematic concentration reached an optimal concentration (Houedè et al., 2014). It is worth stressing that heterogeneus fluctuations in the concentration of efavirenz in plasma of treated patients are a known phenomenon (Apostolova et al. 2015, Hecht et al. 2015), and must be taken into account when evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of RT inhibitors. Case reports also confirmed the NNRTIs anticancer potential in HIV-negative patients with thyroid cancer (Landriscina et al., 2006; Modoni et al., 2007), improved the long-term survival of a patient with small cell lung cancer (Kato et al., 2005), and showed that NNRTI-based HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) promoted the regression of lymphomas (Amengual et al., 2008; Girard et al., 2005).

    LINE-1-encoded RT as a modulator of transcriptome

    Studies addressing the RT-dependent cancer-promoting mechanism have shown that RT inhibitors induce a global alteration of the transcription profiles, at the level of both coding and non-coding RNA populations: specifically, classes of protein-coding genes involved in proliferation, cell migration, and invasion become repressed (Sciamanna et al. 2013; Patnala et al. 2014), while the expression profile of non-coding sequences, including miRNAs and UCRs (ultraconserved long non-coding RNA) - which often show altered expression in cancer types - is deregulated to various extents. A link between RT activity and miRNAs emerged from the finding that melanoma cells exposed to efavirenz exhibit a reversal in the expression pattern of a sub-group of miRNAs, classified as metastamiRs, with key roles in tumor progression and metastasis (Sciamanna et al. 2013). Similarly, LINE-1 silencing in breast cancer cells induce differential expression of many miRNA species (in particular, members of the let-7 family), as well as few piRNAs that can potentially regulate gene expression (Ohms et al. 2014). A hypothetical mechanism for the mechanism of miRNA biosynthesis control by LINE-1-encoded RT has been recently proposed (Sciamanna et al. 2013, 2014). In short, LINE-derived RT, overproduced in cancer cells, can “intercept” RNA transcripts and reverse-transcribe them, forming RNA:DNA hybrid molecules. This would be functionally equivalent to “sequestering” RNA strands that are rendered unavailable for double-stranded (ds) RNA formation. Consequently, production of small regulatory RNAs is impaired, ultimately compromising the expression of coding genes. Consistent with this, the biogenesis of LINE-1-derived miRNAs (Lu et al., 2005) and siRNAs (Chen et al., 2012b) is globally reduced in cancer compared to normal cells. Indeed, nucleic acid fractionation experiments show that RT inhibitors prevent RNA:DNA hybrid formation (Sciamanna et al. 2013), restoring the formation of dsRNAs and re-establishing the biogenesis of miRNAs and their control of transcriptome.

    LINE-1-encoded Reverse Transcriptase as a cancer marker and a diagnostic tool

    The finding that LINE-1 is overexpressed in cancer cells, and growing preclinical and clinical data showing cancer responsiveness to RT inhibition, prompted us to undertake a systematic study to evaluate the expression of RT-containing LINE-1-ORF2p in various human cancer tissues. To this end we have developed a highly specific monoclonal antibody raised against a peptide in the ORF2p EN domain, which enabled us to reveal by immunohistochemistry (IHC) LINE-1- ORF2p expression in bioptic tissues from staged carcinomas (De Luca et al., 2016). IHC analysis of prostate, colon, lung and breast bioptic tissues confirmed high ORF2p expression in carcinoma samples, but not in their healthy counterpart tissues (De Luca et al., 2016). This was consistent with a previous study demonstrating high expression of ORF2p in breast cancer using an unrelated antibody (Chen et al., 2012a).

    Figure 2. ORF2p in progression of human cancers. A: Immunohistochemical staining of ORF2p in prostate cancer stages. Representative sections from: normal gland; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN); adenocarcinoma with Gleason pattern 3 and 4. ORF2p signal intensities (in arbitrary units) were highly signficnatly different alreay in PIN compared to normal samples (details in De Luca et al., 2016). B: Immunohistochemical staining of ORF2p in colon cancer tissue sections. Representative sections from: normal colonic mucosa; transitional mucosa;  adenoma with medium grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. ORF2p signal intensities (in arbitrary units) were highly signficnatly different in transitional compared to normal mucosa (see De Luca et al., 2016).

    Interestingly, high levels of ORF2p expression were observed in very early transformation stages in prostate (Fig. 2A) and colon (Fig. 2B) specimens, before the appearance of typical histological features of carcinoma, and in precancerous lesions; for example, transitional colonic mucosa and prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) showed significantly increased ORFp signal intensity compared to controls. Interestingly, parallel, independent studies demonstrate that genomic DNA hypomethylation occurs in both colonic mucosa and PIN (Suter et al., 2004; Cho et al., 2009).

    In staged samples from both colon and prostate cancer types, ORF2p expression shows a bimodal pattern, with a sharp initial burst in very early stages, followed by a steadier wave in latest stages. It might be speculated that the two waves mark distinct steps in cancer progression: i) the normal-to-precancerous transition, and ii) the evolution from the latter to overt cancer. Aberrant activation of the LINE-1 RT mechanism would induce cell transformation by sequentially converting normal to preneoplastic and eventually to cancer cells through these subsequent steps, implicating the RT enzyme in both phases. The differential activation of LINE-1 RT in different cells might be at the origin of the heterogeneity that characterize tumors (rviewed by Sciamanna et al., 2016)

    The finding that L1- ORF2p expression precedes overt tumorigenesis supports the view that high LINE-1 activity could be a trigger to cell transformation, rather than its consequence. Together, these data indicate that early ORF2p expression represents a valuable biomarker for early cancer detection, at least in colon and prostate cancer. It remains to be established whether ORF2p up-regulation is a more widespread phenomenon in other cancers at early onset.

    Reverse Transcriptase at the genesis of cancer: a model

    The data summarized thus far show that the activation of LINE-1-encoded RT has a cancer-promoting role by impairing the differentiation state of cells, whereas RT repression restores differentiation in cancer cells with an effective anticancer effect. It is generally accepted that several cancer pathways represent the unscheduled resumption of early embryonic pathways that should have been silenced in adult differentitated cells but erroneously escaped that silencing. In analogy with cancer cells, but in a totally unrelated context, LINE-1-encoded RT is activated at fertilization and highly expressed in very early embryogenesis, then becomes silenced in late preimplantation embryos. The precocious, narrow burst of RT expression is crucial for embryo development: indeed, both the RT pharmacological inhibition, and the downregulation of LINE-1 expression, result in arrest of embryo development at the 2- or 4-cell stages (reviewed by Sciamanna et al., 2011).

    By integrating these lines of evidence, RT activity emerges as a distinctive feature of undifferentiated, or poorly differentiated, cells, regardless of their histological origin. In tumorigenesis, a reverse transition occurs from differentiated back to an embryo-like state, accompanied by altered proliferation rates and morphology reflecting a global reprogramming of the transcriptome.

    Available data suggest that, in addition to the known role of retrotransposons in insertional mutagenesis, LINE-1-encoded RT plays a significant epigenetic role in embryogenesis and tumorigenesis by controlling the profile of non-coding regulatory RNAs. As summarized above, LINE-1-encoded RT operates as a master regulator of genome transcription, by regulating the balance between DNA:RNA hybrid and double-stranded RNA formation, and concomitantly acts as a determinant of cell fate. On these grounds, the elevated RT activity observed in virtually every type of cancer can cause the erroneous re-activation of embryonic transcriptional circuits in the wrong environment of adult differentiated cells (reviewed by Spadafora, 2015). Conceptually, therefore, RT-dependent tumorigenesis can be regarded as the specular path to embryogenesis, regressing in the opposite direction and characterized by the re-emergence of embryonic features, including RT reactivation, genome hypomethylation and the erroneous resumption of genome-wide regulatory networks active in embryogenesis (Ma et al., 2010).

    LINE-1 expression is highly sensitive to stressing stimuli and readily modulated by them (Hagan and Rudin, 2002; Miousse et al., 2015). Depending on the nature and intensity of endogenous or exogenous stressors, LINE-1 expression can be activated at differential levels in different cells. As schematically represented in Fig.3, differentially intense (or prolonged) bursts of RT activity likely cause different degrees of transformation, generating the heterogeneity typical of cancer cells (reviewed by Sciamanna et al., 2016). A broad spectrum of transformed cells, from mildly de-differentiated primary cancer cells, to highly aggressive metastatic cells, can thus be simultaneously generated upon the burst of RT activity. The invasive potential of metastatic cells favours their spreading and make them the predominant population in the course of time. This model was inspired by the proposed “Big Bang”
hypothesis for the genesis of human cancer, in which a single
ancestral event is thought to originate the heterogeneity of
cancer cell populations (Sottoriva et al., 2015).
The model predicts that cell transformation is largely due to the reactivation of embryonic regulatory circuits, mostly at the epigenetic level. DNA mutations, except for characterized oncogenes, have lower weight in the genesis of cancer and would rather accumulate in consequence of checkpoint failure during cancer progression.

    Figure 3. A model for RT-dependent induction of cancer cell heterogeneity. The onset of deregulated expression of LINE-1 elements in somatic cells (green), often induced by stressing stimuli (red flash), causes a burst of RT activity that deregulates the transcriptome of individual cells at various levels (represented by different color shades): this originates heterogeneous cancer cell populations (rounded shapes). Cancer cell heterogeneity would thus set in following the early burst of RT activity, differentially expressed in individual cells. Cancer would then progress with the expansion of various cell populations (right).

    Future perspectives

    In a critical article, Hanahan (Hanahan, 2014) has pointed out that the war on cancer, if not lost, is certainly not won yet, and has suggested that therapeutic strategies should stop pursuing highly diversified, narrow paths targeting many single proteins, each of which is highly selective for a specific cancer. Rather, effective therapeutic “bullets” should hit fewer targets shared by a large spectrum of cancers. The proposed strategy in Hanahan's recommendation is strikingly close to that inherent RT inhibitors. Indeed, based on the experience of our and other groups, the RT-dependent cancer-promoting mechanism is shared by a variety of cancers (various carcinoma types, sarcoma, melanoma, and haemathological malignancies), suggesting that a common mechanism is at work in the genesis of a broad spectrum of histologically diverse cancers. The LINE-1- encoded RT, with its ability to remodel the profile of regulatory RNAs, would fulfill the criteria predicted by Hanahan, representing both the driving component of a newly emerging cancer-promoting mechanism and a worth-pursuing therapeutic target. In future work it remains to be seen whether RT inhibitors might represent “universal bullets” in a novel differentiation therapy, effective on an ample spectrum of human cancers.

    Acknowledgments. Work in our laboratories is supported by grants from Fondazione Roma.

    Bibliography

    Determining the origin of synchronous multifocal bladder cancer by exome sequencing
    Acar Ö, Özkurt E, Demir G, Saraç H, Alkan C, Esen T, Somel M, Lack NA
    BMC Cancer 2015 Nov 9;15:871
    PMID 26553077
     
    The Mouse Genomes Project: a repository of inbred laboratory mouse strain genomes
    Adams DJ, Doran AG, Lilue J, Keane TM
    Mamm Genome 2015 Oct;26(9-10):403-12
    PMID 26123534
     
    Unconventional translation of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposons
    Alisch RS, Garcia-Perez JL, Muotri AR, Gage FH, Moran JV
    Genes Dev 2006 Jan 15;20(2):210-24
    PMID 16418485
     
    Regression of HIV-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in response to antiviral therapy alone
    Amengual JE, Zhang X, Ibrahim S, Gardner LB
    Blood 2008 Nov 15;112(10):4359-60
    PMID 18988884
     
    Efavirenz and the CNS: what we already know and questions that need to be answered
    Apostolova N, Funes HA, Blas-Garcia A, Galindo MJ, Alvarez A, Esplugues JV
    J Antimicrob Chemother 2015 Oct;70(10):2693-708
    PMID 26203180
     
    The Human Long Interspersed Element-1 Retrotransposon: An Emerging Biomarker of Neoplasia
    Ardeljan D, Taylor MS, Ting DT, Burns KH
    Clin Chem 2017 Apr;63(4):816-822
    PMID 28188229
     
    Induction of DNA damage and apoptosis in human leukemia cells by efavirenz
    Brüning A, Jückstock J, Kost B, Tsikouras P, Weissenbacher T, Mahner S, Mylonas I
    Oncol Rep 2017 Jan;37(1):617-621
    PMID 27878300
     
    Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population
    Brouha B, Schustak J, Badge RM, Lutz-Prigge S, Farley AH, Moran JV, Kazazian HH Jr
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5280-5
    PMID 12682288
     
    Friends-Enemies: Endogenous Retroviruses Are Major Transcriptional Regulators of Human DNA
    Buzdin AA, Prassolov V, Garazha AV
    Front Chem 2017 Jun 8;5:35
    PMID 28642863
     
    Transposons, Genome Size, and Evolutionary Insights in Animals
    Canapa A, Barucca M, Biscotti MA, Forconi M, Olmo E
    Cytogenet Genome Res 2015;147(4):217-39
    PMID 26967166
     
    Naturally occurring endo-siRNA silences LINE-1 retrotransposons in human cells through DNA methylation
    Chen L, Dahlstrom JE, Lee SH, Rangasamy D
    Epigenetics 2012 Jul;7(7):758-71
    PMID 22647391
     
    Genomic hypomethylation and CpG island hypermethylation in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm
    Cho NY, Kim JH, Moon KC, Kang GH
    Virchows Arch 2009 Jan;454(1):17-23
    PMID 19048291
     
    The dark matter rises: the expanding world of regulatory RNAs
    Clark MB, Choudhary A, Smith MA, Taft RJ, Mattick JS
    Essays Biochem 2013;54:1-16
    PMID 23829523
     
    , LINE-1 expression and retrotransposition in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal carcinoma
    Correction to Supporting Information for Doucet-O'Hare et al
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016 Jan 5;113(1):E104
    PMID 26711990
     
    Genome-wide characterization of human L1 antisense promoter-driven transcripts
    Criscione SW, Theodosakis N, Micevic G, Cornish TC, Burns KH, Neretti N, Rodić N
    BMC Genomics 2016 Jun 14;17:463
    PMID 27301971
     
    Enhanced expression of LINE-1-encoded ORF2 protein in early stages of colon and prostate transformation
    De Luca C, Guadagni F, Sinibaldi-Vallebona P, Sentinelli S, Gallucci M, Hoffmann A, Schumann GG, Spadafora C, Sciamanna I
    Oncotarget 2016 Jan 26;7(4):4048-61
    PMID 26716650
     
    In vitro evaluation of the therapeutic potential of nevirapine in treatment of human thyroid anaplastic carcinoma
    Dong JJ, Zhou Y, Liu YT, Zhang ZW, Zhou XJ, Wang HJ, Liao L
    Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013 May 6;370(1-2):113-8
    PMID 23462194
     
    Overview of Transgenic Mouse Models of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)
    Dunbar A, Nazir A, Levine R
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol 2017 Jun 22;77:14
    PMID 28640953
     
    Widespread somatic L1 retrotransposition occurs early during gastrointestinal cancer evolution
    Ewing AD, Gacita A, Wood LD, Ma F, Xing D, Kim MS, Manda SS, Abril G, Pereira G, Makohon-Moore A, Looijenga LH, Gillis AJ, Hruban RH, Anders RA, Romans KE, Pandey A, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Kazazian HH Jr, Solyom S
    Genome Res 2015 Oct;25(10):1536-45
    PMID 26260970
     
    Global DNA hypomethylation coupled to cellular transformation and metastatic ability
    Funaki S, Nakamura T, Nakatani T, Umehara H, Nakashima H, Okumura M, Oboki K, Matsumoto K, Saito H, Nakano T
    FEBS Lett 2015 Dec 21;589(24 Pt B):4053-60
    PMID 26608031
     
    HIV+ MALT lymphoma remission induced by highly active antiretroviral therapy alone
    Girard T, Luquet-Besson I, Baran-Marszak F, Raphaül M, Boué F
    Eur J Haematol 2005 Jan;74(1):70-2
    PMID 15613110
     
    Retrotransposons revisited: the restraint and rehabilitation of parasites
    Goodier JL, Kazazian HH Jr
    Cell 2008 Oct 3;135(1):23-35
    PMID 18854152
     
    Mobile genetic element activation and genotoxic cancer therapy: potential clinical implications
    Hagan CR, Rudin CM
    Am J Pharmacogenomics 2002;2(1):25-35
    PMID 12083952
     
    Rethinking the war on cancer
    Hanahan D
    Lancet 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):558-63
    PMID 24351321
     
    Association of nuclear localization of a long interspersed nuclear element-1 protein in breast tumors with poor prognostic outcomes
    Harris CR, Normart R, Yang Q, Stevenson E, Haffty BG, Ganesan S, Cordon-Cardo C, Levine AJ, Tang LH
    Genes Cancer 2010 Feb;1(2):115-24
    PMID 20948976
     
    Efavirenz Has the Highest Anti-Proliferative Effect of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors against Pancreatic Cancer Cells
    Hecht M, Erber S, Harrer T, Klinker H, Roth T, Parsch H, Fiebig N, Fietkau R, Distel LV
    PLoS One 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0130277
    PMID 26086472
     
    Cytotoxic effect of efavirenz is selective against cancer cells and associated with the cannabinoid system
    Hecht M, Harrer T, Büttner M, Schwegler M, Erber S, Fietkau R, Distel LV
    AIDS 2013 Aug 24;27(13):2031-40
    PMID 23612009
     
    A phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of efavirenz in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Houédé N, Pulido M, Mourey L, Joly F, Ferrero JM, Bellera C, Priou F, Lalet C, Laroche-Clary A, Raffin MC, Ichas F, Puech A, Piazza PV
    Oncologist 2014 Dec;19(12):1227-8
    PMID 25355844
     
    A long-term survival case of small cell lung cancer in an HIV-infected patient
    Kato T, Ieki R, Saito E, Ota T, Yuasa K, Iguchi M, Okamura T, Shibuya M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005 Jun;35(6):349-52
    PMID 15928189
     
    Evolutionary diversification of DYX1C1 transcripts via an HERV-H LTR integration event
    Kim YJ, Huh JW, Kim DS, Han K, Kim HM, Kim HS
    Genes Genet Syst 2011;86(4):277-84
    PMID 22214596
     
    In vitro properties of the first ORF protein from mouse LINE-1 support its role in ribonucleoprotein particle formation during retrotransposition
    Kolosha VO, Martin SL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997 Sep 16;94(19):10155-60
    PMID 9294179
     
    Nevirapine restores androgen signaling in hormone-refractory human prostate carcinoma cells both in vitro and in vivo
    Landriscina M, Bagalà C, Piscazzi A, Schinzari G, Quirino M, Fabiano A, Bianchetti S, Cassano A, Sica G, Barone C
    Prostate 2009 May 15;69(7):744-54
    PMID 19152342
     
    Dynamic interactions between transposable elements and their hosts
    Levin HL, Moran JV
    Nat Rev Genet 2011 Aug 18;12(9):615-27
    PMID 21850042
     
    Antitumor effect of combination of the inhibitors of two new oncotargets: proton pumps and reverse transcriptase
    Lugini L, Sciamanna I, Federici C, Iessi E, Spugnini EP, Fais S
    Oncotarget 2017 Jan 17;8(3):4147-4155
    PMID 27926505
     
    Exposure of normal and transformed cells to nevirapine, a reverse transcriptase inhibitor, reduces cell growth and promotes differentiation
    Mangiacasale R, Pittoggi C, Sciamanna I, Careddu A, Mattei E, Lorenzini R, Travaglini L, Landriscina M, Barone C, Nervi C, Lavia P, Spadafora C
    Oncogene 2003 May 8;22(18):2750-61
    PMID 12747369
     
    Synchronous expression of LINE-1 RNA and protein in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells
    Martin SL, Branciforte D
    Mol Cell Biol 1993 Sep;13(9):5383-92
    PMID 8395003
     
    Annotation of the domestic pig genome by quantitative proteogenomics
    Marx H, Hahne H, Ulbrich SE, Schnieke A, Rottmann O, Frishman D, Kuster B
    J Proteome Res 2017 Jun 19
    PMID 28625053
     
    Disruption of the APC gene by a retrotransposal insertion of L1 sequence in a colon cancer
    Miki Y, Nishisho I, Horii A, Miyoshi Y, Utsunomiya J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Nakamura Y
    Cancer Res 1992 Feb 1;52(3):643-5
    PMID 1310068
     
    The Fine LINE: Methylation Drawing the Cancer Landscape
    Miousse IR, Koturbash I
    Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:131547
    PMID 26448926
     
    Reinduction of cell differentiation and 131I uptake in a poorly differentiated thyroid tumor in response to the reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitor nevirapine
    Modoni S, Landriscina M, Fabiano A, Fersini A, Urbano N, Ambrosi A, Cignarelli M
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2007 Apr;22(2):289-95
    PMID 17600478
     
    Insertional mutagenesis of the myc locus by a LINE-1 sequence in a human breast carcinoma
    Morse B, Rotherg PG, South VJ, Spandorfer JM, Astrin SM
    Nature 1988 May 5;333(6168):87-90
    PMID 2834650
     
    L1 Retrotransposition in Neural Progenitor Cells
    Muotri AR
    Methods Mol Biol 2016;1400:157-63
    PMID 26895053
     
    Silencing of LINE-1 retrotransposons contributes to variation in small noncoding RNA expression in human cancer cells
    Ohms S, Rangasamy D
    Oncotarget 2014 Jun 30;5(12):4103-17
    PMID 24980824
     
    Distinct roles for LINE-1 and HERV-K retroelements in cell proliferation, differentiation and tumor progression
    Oricchio E, Sciamanna I, Beraldi R, Tolstonog GV, Schumann GG, Spadafora C
    Oncogene 2007 Jun 21;26(29):4226-33
    PMID 17237820
     
    Inhibition of LINE-1 retrotransposon-encoded reverse transcriptase modulates the expression of cell differentiation genes in breast cancer cells
    Patnala R, Lee SH, Dahlstrom JE, Ohms S, Chen L, Dheen ST, Rangasamy D
    Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014 Jan;143(2):239-53
    PMID 24337508
     
    Retrotransposon insertions in the clonal evolution of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Rodić N, Steranka JP, Makohon-Moore A, Moyer A, Shen P, Sharma R, Kohutek ZA, Huang CR, Ahn D, Mita P, Taylor MS, Barker NJ, Hruban RH, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Boeke JD, Burns KH
    Nat Med 2015 Sep;21(9):1060-4
    PMID 26259033
     
    The Reverse Transcriptase Encoded by LINE-1 Retrotransposons in the Genesis, Progression, and Therapy of Cancer
    Sciamanna I, De Luca C, Spadafora C
    Front Chem 2016 Feb 11;4:6
    PMID 26904537
     
    Endogenous retrotransposition activates oncogenic pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shukla R, Upton KR, Muñoz-Lopez M, Gerhardt DJ, Fisher ME, Nguyen T, Brennan PM, Baillie JK, Collino A, Ghisletti S, Sinha S, Iannelli F, Radaelli E, Dos Santos A, Rapoud D, Guettier C, Samuel D, Natoli G, Carninci P, Ciccarelli FD, Garcia-Perez JL, Faivre J, Faulkner GJ
    Cell 2013 Mar 28;153(1):101-11
    PMID 23540693
     
    A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth
    Sottoriva A, Kang H, Ma Z, Graham TA, Salomon MP, Zhao J, Marjoram P, Siegmund K, Press MF, Shibata D, Curtis C
    Nat Genet 2015 Mar;47(3):209-16
    PMID 25665006
     
    A LINE-1-encoded reverse transcriptase-dependent regulatory mechanism is active in embryogenesis and tumorigenesis
    Spadafora C
    Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015 Apr;1341:164-71
    PMID 25586649
     
    Nevirapine induces growth arrest and premature senescence in human cervical carcinoma cells
    Stefanidis K, Loutradis D, Vassiliou LV, Anastasiadou V, Kiapekou E, Nikas V, Patris G, Vlachos G, Rodolakis A, Antsaklis A
    Gynecol Oncol 2008 Nov;111(2):344-9
    PMID 18822454
     
    Expression of LINE-1 p40 protein in pediatric malignant germ cell tumors and its association with clinicopathological parameters: a report from the Children's Oncology Group
    Su Y, Davies S, Davis M, Lu H, Giller R, Krailo M, Cai Q, Robison L, Shu XO; Children's Oncology Group
    Cancer Lett 2007 Mar 18;247(2):204-12
    PMID 16759797
     
    Hypomethylation of L1 retrotransposons in colorectal cancer and adjacent normal tissue
    Suter CM, Martin DI, Ward RL
    Int J Colorectal Dis 2004 Mar;19(2):95-101
    PMID 14534800
     
    Human transposon insertion profiling: Analysis, visualization and identification of somatic LINE-1 insertions in ovarian cancer
    Tang Z, Steranka JP, Ma S, Grivainis M, Rodić N, Huang CR, Shih IM, Wang TL, Boeke JD, Fenyö D, Burns KH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017 Jan 31;114(5):E733-E740
    PMID 28096347
     
    Expression of a LINE-1 endonuclease variant in gastric cancer: its association with clinicopathological parameters
    Wang G, Gao J, Huang H, Tian Y, Xue L, Wang W, You W, Lian H, Duan X, Wu B, Wang M
    BMC Cancer 2013 May 29;13:265
    PMID 23718141
     
    Epigenetic modulation on cat-cow interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos by treatment with trichostatin A
    Wittayarat M, Sato Y, Do LT, Chatdarong K, Tharasanit T, Techakumphu M, Taniguchi M, Otoi T
    Anim Sci J 2017 Apr;88(4):593-601
    PMID 27506538
     
    Written2017-06Ilaria Sciamanna, Annalucia Serafino, Corrado Spadafora
    Superiore di Sanità (IS), Institute of Translational Pharmacology, CNR (AS, CS), Rome, Italy; corrado.spadafora@gmail.com

    Citation

    This paper should be referenced as such :
    Sciamanna I, Serafino A , Spadafora C
    LINE-1-encoded Reverse Transcriptase in the genesis and therapy of cance
    Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. in press
    On line version : http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org/Deep/LINE1inCancerID20146.htm

    © Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology
    indexed on : Tue Sep 26 12:38:26 CEST 2017


    Home   Genes    Leukemias    Solid Tumors    Cancer-Prone    Deep Insight    Case Reports    Journals   Portal    Teaching   

    X Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NA

    For comments and suggestions or contributions, please contact us

    jlhuret@AtlasGeneticsOncology.org.