1Department of Endocrinology, Pathophysiology and Applied Biology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
2Department of Internal Medicine, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Dr. Paolo Magni, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Somatostatin (SS) is an inhibitory tetradecapeptide hormone with exocrine, endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine activities, which plays an important regulatory role in several cell functions, including inhibition of endocrine secretion and cell proliferation. Most of the effects of SS and of its currently available analogs are mediated via five different G protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs), codenamed sst1-5. SS receptors (ssts) are expressed in a tissue- and subtype-selective manner in both normal and neoplastic cells, and the majority of SS target tissues express multiple ssts. Recent data suggest that when ssts are coexpressed, they may interact forming homo- and hetero-dimers also with other GPCRs, thus altering their original pharmacological and functional profiles. The formation of dimers can be not only constitutive, but also ligand-promoted: hence, compounds with high affinity for the different receptor subtypes can be used to achieve effects elicited by specific dimers. A feature common to most GPCRs is the cyclic process of signaling, desensitization, internalization, resensitization, and recycling to the plasma membrane. These events prevent cells from undergoing excessive receptor stimulation or periods of prolonged inactivity. SS receptors differently internalize after agonist binding and, specifically, sst2, sst3 and sst5 are internalized to a greater extent than sst1 or sst4. ssts are linked to several second messenger systems which are involved in their downstream intracellular response (i.e., adenylyl cyclase, calcium and potassium ion channels, Na+/H+ antiporter, phospholipase C, phospholipase A2, mitogen activated protein kinase, NO/cGMP, and serine-, threonine, and phosphotyrosyl- protein phosphatase).
Interestingly, SS and SS analogs can control tumor development and progression/metastatization by direct actions, mediated by the ssts, and indirect actions, independent of receptor involvement. The direct antiproliferative effects include inhibition of autocrine/paracrine growth-promoting hormone/growth factor synthesis, arrest of cell division (by blockade of growth factor-mediated mitogenic signals), suppression of cell invasion and induction of apoptosis (programmed cell death). Indirect antitumor effects of SS include suppression of synthesis or/and release of growth factors and growth-promoting hormones, such as insulin, prolactin, insulin like-growth factor 1, epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-, gastrin, cholecystokinin and growth hormone. A specific pattern of ssts activation thus seems to elicit relevant antitumoral actions and deserves further exploitation with the aim of validating novel therapeutic approaches to cancer.
Somatostatin (SS) was first identified in the ovine hypothalamus as a tetradecapeptide that inhibited the release of growth hormone (Brazeau et al., 1973). SS-producing cells are present at high densities throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems. In the periphery, SS is also secreted by pancreas and gut and in a lesser extent by thyroid, adrenals and submandibular glands, kidneys, prostate, and placenta (Polak et al., 1975). SS mediates a variety of biological effects, the most important occurring at the pituitary (inhibition of growth hormone (GH) and tireotropic stimulating hormone (TSH) secretion) and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) levels (inhibition of insulin, glucagon, and secretin secretion; inhibition of hydrochloric acid production and intestinal fluid absorption) (Konturek et al., 1976). In addition to inhibition of hormone secretion, SS also shows antiproliferative and anti-angiogenetic properties, that have been largely investigated both in cell lines (i.e., human prostate cancer cells, human non small lung cell carcinomas and pituitary adenomas) and GH-secreting tumors. The SS form originally identified in the hypothalamus was SS-14, while SS-28, a congener of SS-14 extended at the N-terminus, was discovered subsequently (Shen et al., 1982). The single human SS gene is located on chromosome 3q28 and the correlate SS mRNA codes for a 116-amino acids (aa) prepro-SS protein (MW 12,727 Da). Prepro-SS has a sequence of hydrophobic aa at the N-terminus which is cleaved at the gly-ala junction at position -78 (from the N-terminus to the C-terminus). Pro-SS undergoes both monobasic (Arg-15) and dibasic (Arg-2Lys-1) cleavages to release the two biofunctional hormones SS-28 and SS-14 (Funckes et al., 1983; Brakch et al., 2002) (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Amino acid sequences of the human prosomatostatin.
2. Somatostatin receptors
In mammals, the biological actions of SS are mediated by at least six G protein-coupled SS receptors (sst) encoded by five different genes, named sst1-sst5. Sst2 exists in two splice variants, sst2A (a long form) and sst2B (a short form), which differ only in the length of the cytoplasmic tail. Sst2 displays a cryptic intron at the 3' end of the coding region, which gives rise to the two spliced variants (Baumeister and Meyerhof, 2000; Olias et al., 2004). In the human gene, the spliced exon encodes for 25 aa residues compared to 38 residues in the unspliced form. The encoded receptor proteins range in size from 356 to 391 aa residues, showing the greatest sequence similarity in the putative transmembrane region, and diverge at their N- and C-terminal segments (Patel, 1999). Human ssts genes are localized to chromosome 14q13 (sst1), 17q24 (sst2), 22q13.1 (sst3), 20p11.2 (sst4), and 16p13.3 (sst5) (Yamada et al., 1993) encoding for proteins of 391 aa, 369 aa, 418 aa, 388 aa, and 363 aa, respectively (Yamada et al., 1992; Corness et al., 1993; Rohrer et al., 1993; Panetta et al., 1994). Structurally, those receptors belong to the so-called "superfamily" of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). All sst isoforms possess a highly conserved sequence motif, YANSCANPI/VLY, in the seventh transmembrane region, which serves as a signature sequence for this receptor family (Kreienkamp et al., 2002). On the other hand, genes for sst1, 3, 4, and sst5 lack classical introns. Interestingly, the estimated sequence identity between sst1 and sst2 receptors is 46%. The deduced aa sequence of human sst3 receptors displays the following degrees of similarity with other members of the sst family: 62% (sst1), 64% (sst2), and 58% (sst4). Moreover, four ssts have been identified in fish and variant forms of several ssts also exist: sst3a, sst3b, sst5a, sst5b, and sst5c in goldfish (Canosa et al., 2004), and sst1a and sst1b in trout (Slagter and Sheridan, 2004). As was the case with SS genes, phylogenetic analysis suggests that sst genes appear to have arisen from a series of gene duplication events.
2.1 Homo- and hetero-dimerization of somatostatin receptor subtypes
When ssts in the cell membrane are coexpressed, they may interact forming homo- and hetero-dimers also with other GPCRs, thus altering their original pharmacological and functional profiles. A series of studies, carried out on transfected cell lines, have shown that dimers can consist of two identical sst subtypes (homodimers) or two different subtypes (heterodimers), with a range of possible combinations depending on the specific subtype and, probably, on the specific sst-expressing population (Baragli et al., 2007).
The five SS receptor isoforms can be involved in the formation of different dimers, namely, sst1 and sst5 bind efficiently together, while stable sst4-sst5 dimers have not been observed. These interactions are capable to provide greater signalling diversity, affecting the downstream intracellular effects mediated by receptor activation, such as ligand binding affinity, agonist-induced regulation and trafficking. In fact, sst1 endocytosis is enhanced when sst1 and sst5 are co-expressed in the same cell and sst5 is activated; conversely, the internalization of sst2 is delayed by sst5 and sst2 co-expression. Moreover, ssts can form also heterodimers with other GPCRs: sst2 interacts with the μ-opioid receptor, and sst5 binds to the D2 dopamine receptor (D2R). Interestingly, the sst5-D2R dimer enhances the effects of both receptors, leading to a more potent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) (Møller et al., 2003).
The dimer formation can be not only constitutive, but also ligand-promoted: hence, compounds with high affinity for the different receptor subtypes can be used to achieve effects elicited by specific dimers. In the last years, a variety of mono-, bi- and pan-specific SS analogs has been synthesized, allowing the characterization of the intracellular effectors involved in the downstream signalling of the different ssts (Saveanu et al., 2001). The new receptor specific compounds showed to be useful under many aspects; among them, the understanding of the synergistic effect caused by the simultaneous activation of different receptors. In cultured pituitary cells, a sst2-D2R chimeric compound (BIM-23A387) showed a more potent action in inhibiting prolactin (PRL) and GH secretion compared to the related mono-specific analogs, either alone or in combination (Ferone et al., 2007). A similar pattern of action has been observed for the anti-secretory and anti-proliferative activity in prostate and lung in vitro models, where the treatment with the chimeric sst2-sst5 and sst2-sst5-D2R compounds were more effective than the respective mono-specific SS and D2R analogs (Arvigo et al., 2010). This evidence suggests that the concurrent activation of different GPCRs triggers their dimerization, leading to an enhanced effect.
2.2 Trafficking of somatostatin receptor subtypes
A feature common to most GPCRs is the cyclic process of signaling, desensitization, internalization, resensitization, and recycling to the plasma membrane. These events prevent cells from undergoing excessive receptor stimulation or periods of prolonged inactivity (van Koppen et al., 2004).
SS receptors differently internalize after agonist binding and, specifically, sst2, sst3 and sst5 are internalized to a higher extent than sst1 or sst4. Among all subtypes, the agonist-mediated trafficking of both sst2 splicing isoforms are the mostly described (Jacobs and Schulz, 2008). Investigations in neuroendocrine tumors showed that both sst2A and sst2B isoforms are rapidly desensitized and internalized after agonist-mediated phosphorylation. Receptor phosphorylation, which involves sites located in the third intracellular loop and in the C-terminal tail, is followed by recruitment of β-arrestin to the receptor forming a stable complex, which is internalized into the same endocytotic vesicles. Interestingly, the binding affinity of the agonist plays an important role in the degree of receptor internalization. A high binding affinity of the agonist is a prerequisite for triggering sst2 internalization. In fact, the bi-specific sst2/sst5 analog BIM23244, which has a greater sst2 affinity compared to L-817/818 analog is able to induce a greater internalization (Jacobs and Schulz, 2008).
Sst5 differs from sst2A in its cellular localization and appears to be predominantly located in intracellular components even without agonist treatment, whereas after stimulation, a large amount of intracellular receptors is recruited to the cell surface. The sst5 third intracellular (i3) loop and the C-terminal tail have been found to regulate receptor internalization, which occurs via clathrin-dependent mechanisms. In cultured pituitary cell lines, where sst5 underwent different kinds of point mutations within the i3 loop, there is a reduction of receptor internalization upon SS-28 treatment. Moreover, by using different C-terminus truncated forms of the receptor, an enhanced sst5 internalization has been observed, thus showing that the sst5 C-terminal tail, or at least a part of it, has an inhibitory role in receptor internalization (Peverelli et al., 2008).
Sst3, which shows high affinity for SS-14, internalizes efficiently after agonist stimulation through a clathrin-dependent mediated pathway. Without stimulation, sst3 is almost exclusively located at the plasma membrane, whereas after agonist withdrawal only a small amount of sst3 is recycled to the cell surface (Peverelli et al., 2008).
Hence, due to the differential expression of SS receptors in tumors, the comparison of their ability to undergo agonist-induced desensitization and internalization may provide important clues for the clinical use of SS analogs. In this context, an in vitro study demonstrated that short-term administration of the multiligand (sst1/sst2/sst3/sst5) pasireotide (SOM230) modulates SS receptor trafficking in a manner clearly distinct from octreotide (sst2/sst5) (Tulipano and Schulz, 2007). SOM230 was less potent than octreotide in inducing signaling and internalization of the sst2 receptor. Whereas octreotide-activated sst2 receptors cointernalized with β-arrestin-2 into the same endocytic vesicles, SOM230-mediated sst2 activation led to the formation of unstable complexes that dissociated at or near the plasma membrane. Sst2 receptors recycled faster to the plasma membrane in SOM230- than in octreotide-treated cells. The accelerated recycling of SOM230-activated receptors may counteract homologous desensitization in sst2-expressing cells and, hence, result in longer lasting functional responses of SOM230 (Lesche et al., 2009).
Figure 2. Schematic representation of a ligand-driven somatostatin receptor internalization. GRK: GPCR kinase; CCV: clathrin-coated vesicle (modified from van Koppen et al., 2004).
2.3 Somatostatin receptor signalling pathways
All five SS isoforms (ssts) bind/interact to G proteins to activate their signalling pathways. They couple to all three Gi subunits (Gi1, Gi2, and Gi3) leading to a potent inhibition of AC activation, and then of cyclic AMP (cAMP) synthesis. Specifically, sst1 is coupled to AC via Gi3; sst2A is able to associate with Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, and Gao2; sst3 interacts with Gi1, Gi2, Gi4, and Gi6 (Reisine and Bell, 1995).
Several second messenger systems are involved in their downstream intracellular response: AC, calcium (Ca2+) and potassium (K+) ion channels, sodium (Na+)/H+ antiporter, phospholipase C (PLC), phospholipase A2 (PLA2), mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), NO/cGMP, and serine-, threonine-, and phosphotyrosyl-protein phosphatase (PTP) (Patel, 1999).
Sst2 and sst4 are the main receptors that activate voltage-gated K+ current (Yang and Chen, 2007). As a result of their activation, membrane hyperpolarization occurs, hindering any subsequent spontaneous membrane potential and leading to a reduction in intracellular Ca2+. Ssts can differently modify Ca2+ currents; in AtT-20 murine cell line, both sst2 and sst5 can couple negatively to an L-type Ca2+ channel reducing Ca2+ influx (Tallent et al., 1996), whereas, conversely, in the GH3 rat pituitary tumor cell line, only sst2 blocks voltage-gated Ca2+ current (Yang and Chen, 2007).
The human ssts also stimulate PTP through a pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway involving Gi2, but differencies among the various species have been found, since sst5 in rat does not regulate PTP. The first evidence of ssts-mediated activation of PTP was given by the counteraction driven by ssts on tyrosine kinase receptors-mediated proliferative effect (Florio, 2008a). One of the main downstream effects of ssts-mediated PTP activation is the inhibition of MAPK ERK1/2 activity. Several data exist about the inhibition of the MAPK signalling cascade by three of the five sst subtypes: sst2, sst3 and sst5. In AtT-20 and in transfected CHO-K1 cells, sst5 constitutively restrains ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Ben-Shlomo et al., 2007), and sst2 and sst3 mediated the same inhibitory signal in SHSY-5Y neuroblastoma cells and in NIH3T3 cells, respectively. Conversely, sst1 and sst4 stimulate the MAPK pathway (Patel, 1999).
Glutamate receptor ion channels are also involved in ssts signalling: sst2 inhibits AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated glutamate currents, while sst1 stimulates AMPA/kainate receptor activity in cultured mouse hypothalamic neurons.
Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) represents another intracellular signalling pathway linked to sst2. In CHO-DG44 cells, it takes place via sst2-mediated activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K), whereas in astrocytes and in intestinal smooth muscle cells it is driven by PLC (Florio, 2008a). Experimental data in rat pituitary F4C1 cells indicate that the activation of sst2, but not sst1, stimulates PLC activity and increases cytosolic Ca2+level, due to Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (Rosskopf et al., 2003).
In hippocampal neurons, SS effect on PLA-2-dependent stimulation of arachidonate production has been associated with sst4, which is able to elicit arachidonate synthesis through phospholipase A2 (PLA-2) activation (Patel, 1999).
In colon carcinoma, enteric endocrine and hepatic cells, the Na+/H+ exchangers can be also activated by sst1, sst3 and sst4, but not by sst2 and sst5 (Florio, 2008a).
Interestingly, in human sst5 there are two regions, the BBXXB domain and the DRY motif, located in the third intracellular (i3) and second intracellular (i2) loops, respectively, which are needed to activate the signalling pathways mediated by this receptor subtype. Namely, the BBXXB domain, although being required in the subtype 5 downstream effectors generation, is not directly involved in interactions with Gi protein, since a mutation in the first BBXXB residue does not affect the receptor ability of inhibiting cAMP accumulation. Conversely, the DRY motif was found to be crucial in coupling with Gi protein, since mutations in the DRY sequence do not impair sst5-driven inhibition of cAMP production. However, both regions are necessary to mediate the other sst5 intracellular responses, such as cytoplasmic Ca2+ reduction and inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Peverelli et al., 2009).
Tumorigenesis is a collection of complex genetic diseases characterized by multiple defects in the homeostatic mechanisms that regulate cell growth, proliferation and differentiation. In humans, several lines of evidence indicate that tumorigenesis is a multistep process which reflects genetic alterations that drive the progressive transformation of normal cells into highly malignant derivatives. Tumorigenesis is thought to require four to six stochastic rate-limiting mutation events to occur in the lineage of one cell. Hanahan and Weinberg (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000) suggest that six cellular alterations, or hallmarks, collectively drive a population of normal cells to become a cancer. The six hallmarks are (i) self-sufficiency in growth signals (SG), (ii) insensitivity to antigrowth signals (IA), (iii) evasion of apoptosis (EA), (iv) limitless replicative potential (LR), (v) sustained angiogenesis (SA), and (vi) tissue invasion and metastasis. Genetic instability (GI) is defined as an "enabling characteristic" that facilitates the acquisition of other mutations due to defects in DNA repair. These hallmarks form a candidate set of rules that underlie the transformation of a normal tissue to a cancerous one and are shared in common by most and perhaps all types of human tumors (Spencer et al., 2006).
3.1 Antitumor actions of somatostatin and somatostatin analogs
SS has been shown to display several biological actions which include inhibition of exocrine and endocrine secretions, gut motility, cell proliferation, cell survival and angiogenesis. SS analogs show antineoplastic and antiproliferative activity in many experimental in vivo and in vitro models and this activity is principally attributed to activation of sst2 and sst5. SS analogs treatment can be effective in the control of tumor growth in humans and in 37-82% of patients receiving SS analogs, as primary medical therapy, tumor shrinkage has been observed. The antiproliferative and antitumoral effects of SS analogs occur independently of their antisecretory and antihormonal effects. From these results we can infer that antisecretory and antitumor effects of SS and SS analogs are mediated by different receptors/signalling pathways and that the antiproliferative effect of these synthetic compounds may depend on tumor ssts profile, but also on the specific target cell intracellular signalling (Pyronnet et al., 2008).
SS and SS analogs can control tumor development and progression/metastatization by two separate mechanisms: direct actions, mediated by the ssts, and indirect actions, independent of the receptors.
3.1.1 Direct somatostatin antitumor actions
Direct effects of SS and its analogs on tumor cell growth and spread derive from interaction with specific tumor cell membrane receptors. The direct antiproliferative actions include inhibition of autocrine/paracrine growth-promoting hormone/growth factor synthesis, arrest of cell division (by blockade of growth factor-mediated mitogenic signals), suppression of cell invasion and induction of apoptosis (programmed cell death) (Pyronnet et al., 2008). The exact antitumoral mechanism initiated by SS analogs depends on the tumor cell type and the ssts to which it binds. In this way, each receptor subtype is able to mediate different biological actions (Susini and Buscail, 2006).
Cell cycle arrest is mediated by interaction of SS with its five receptors and the consequent initiation of several intracellular signalling pathways, which are either activated or inhibited according to the sst subtype, the downstream recruited enzyme and cell environment. These pathways include activation of tyrosine kinases (JAK, c-src) and tyrosine phosphatases (SHP1, SHP2, PTP), activation/inhibition of nitric oxide synthase/cGMP-dependent protein kinase, Ras/ERK pathway and inhibition of PI3 kinase/Akt pathway, which in turn lead to induction of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1 or p21Cip1 and cell cycle arrest (Pyronnet et al., 2008). SS also induces cell growth inhibition through restoration of functional gap junctions. These structures are composed of connexins and play a pivotal role in maintaining the differentiated state and cell-contact inhibition. Actually, in most cancer cells, it has been observed an impaired expression of connexins (Lahlou et al., 2005). It has been demonstrated that SS is also a potent anti-migratory and anti-invasive agent for various tumor cells. Inhibition of cell invasion occurs through molecular mechanisms which are cell type specific and depend on sst expression pattern, on sst effector coupling as well as on the signalling cascade involved in target cells (Pola et al., 2003).
SS analogs are also thought to inhibit cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis. The receptor subtypes primarily involved in SS-induced apoptosis are sst3 and sst2. Apoptotic effect is achieved by regulation of the two main signalling pathways, the cell-extrinsic pathway (triggered by death receptors) and the cell-intrinsic pathway (also called the mitochondrial pathway) (Pyronnet et al., 2008; Florio, 2008b).
SS and its chemically designed analogs are potential therapeutic agents, in particular for the treatment of endocrine diseases that cause hormone hypersecretory syndromes. SS and its commercially available analogs exert antisecretory and antiproliferative effects by interacting with one or more of the five ssts, which then trigger various intracellular signalling pathways according to the tissue, thus possibly leading to different actions. The tissue expression patterns of ssts, the binding profile of agonists and ssts effector coupling confer functional and therapeutic specificity to ligand activity (Zatelli and degli Uberti, 2009).
The two SS analogs currently used in the clinics are Octreotide and Lanreotide. They have demonstrated efficacy in reducing GH and IGF-1 levels in up to 60% of patients with acromegaly and therefore have been widely used in the treatment of GH hypersecretion (Shimon et al., 1997). The main pharmacological target of these compounds is sst2, the receptor subtype which is the most frequently expressed in human GH-secreting pituitary adenomas, but they also bind, with a lesser affinity, to sst5. However, a significant proportion of patients with acromegaly is resistant to the treatment with ocreotide.
Pasireotide (SOM-230), a compound that interacts with multiple ssts (sst1-2-3-5) is able to inhibit GH secretion in octreotide-resistant pituitary adenomas, representing a potential therapy for octreotide-resistant acromegaly patients (Petersenn et al., 2010). The efficacy of pasireotide in overcoming octreotide resistance has been attributed to its ability of binding to all ssts and, in particular, to its greater affinity for sst5, which is up-regulated in such tumors. This ssts multiligand compound showed in vitro a significant reduction of cell viability in many non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) probably through the inhibition of VEGF secretion. Several results suggested that pasireotide could be a potential therapeutic agent for conditions characterized by an excess of ACTH. In patients with Cushing's disease, the administration of pasireotide decreased urinary free cortisol levels and significantly improved symptoms associated with the disease. Moreover, in ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor cells, pasireotide reduced ACTH secretion and cell proliferation (Bode et al., 2010). NFPAs represent a possible therapeutic target also for selective sst1 agonists as these tumors have been demonstrated to express sst1. The sst1 agonist BIM-23926 has exhibited antisecretory and antiproliferative effects in a group of NFPAs in vitro. Moreover, several findings support the hypothesis that chimeric ssts/DR agonists can be effective in suppressing in vitro cell proliferation in the majority of NFPAs. Indeed, BIM-23A387, a chimeric sst2/DR2 selective agonist inhibits cell viability in most NFPA primary cultures, as well as BIM-23A760, a compound with high affinity for DR2, sst2 and sst5 significantly suppresses DNA synthesis in the 60% of the NFPA cultures tested (Florio et al., 2008).
It has been observed that SS and its analogs can decrease plasma calcitonin levels and improve symptoms in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), but their antiproliferative effects remain controversial. As a matter of fact, in TT cells, a human MTC cell line expressing all ssts, sst2 activation leads to inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell proliferation, whereas sst5 activation has an opposite effect. Thus, we can infer that sst2 and sst5 agonists can antagonize the activity of one another in contrast to what happens in pituitary adenomas. Potent sst1-selective ligands (BIM-23296 and BIM-23745) could have a therapeutic role in MTC because they are effective in reducing DNA synthesis, the viability of TT cells, calcitonin secretion and gene expression (Zatelli et al., 2006).
Ssts are also highly expressed in most neuroendocrine tumors with a variable expression patterns. Treatment with Octreotide and Lanreotide is ineffective in inhibiting hormone secretion in some patients with neuroendocrine tumors because they develop tachyphylaxis. Conversely, pasireotide has shown a considerable reduction of symptoms in the majority of patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors (Desai et al., 2009).
Experimental data on prostate cancer showed that four (sst1-2-3-5) out of five ssts receptors were found to be expressed in the LNCaP cell line, an in vitro model of human androgen-dependent PCa. Their activation by selective SS agonists resulted in a significant anti-proliferative effect with a peculiar pattern according to receptor subtype, ligand affinity and, possibly, receptor dimerization. Moreover, such treatments were also able to modulate the profile of the IGF system, known to be involved in PCa progression. Interestingly, these data provide strong evidence for an inhibitory role of sst1 activation on PCa cell proliferation, suggesting that SS agonists with enhanced sst1 affinity and selectivity may have great potentiality as pharmacological tools for at least androgen-dependent PCa treatment. In addition, the antiproliferative effect of sst1 and sst5 mono-specific agonists may be due, at least in part, to the inhibition of IGF-I secretion (Ruscica et al., 2010).
3.1.2 Indirect somatostatin antitumor mechanisms
Indirect antitumor effects of SS include suppression of synthesis or/and release of growth factors and growth-promoting hormones such as insulin, prolactin, IGF-1, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor- (TGF-), gastrin, cholecystokinin (CCK) and GH.
Several experimental in vitro and in vivo results indicate that another indirect action of SS and SS analogs on tumor growth may be the inhibition of angiogenesis. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from an existing capillary network, is necessary for tumor neovascularization, which is essential for tumor growth, invasion and for dissemination of metastasis. By limiting the blood supply, tumor growth can be effectively controlled (Kvols and Woltering, 2006). SS and SS analogs exert antiangiogenic actions through different mechanisms like suppression of endothelial cell proliferation and arrest of monocyte and endothelial cell migration. Normal endothelial cells lack sst2 receptors and the expression of this receptor subtype on endothelial cells uniquely appears as they proliferate to form new blood vessels (Kvols and Woltering, 2006). So, the inhibition of angiogenesis may result from the up-regulation of sst2 during the angiogenic switch from resting to proliferating endothelium. However, other ssts such as sst3 and sst5 may also play a role. At the molecular level, this effect results from SS-mediated inhibition of MAP kinase activity and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) activity. Another mechanism by which SS analogs suppress angiogenesis is through a broad inhibition of both the release and the effect of growth factors, some of which are angiogenic, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor, IGF-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor. These growth factors, secreted by tumor cells and infiltrating inflammatory cells, stimulate endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, important processes in angiogenesis (Zatelli et al., 2007).
4. Somatostatin receptor activation and tumorigenesis: future directions
According to the evidence reported in the present paper, a specific pattern of ssts activation seems to elicit important antitumoral actions with potential relevance to some solid tumors expressing these receptor isoforms. In addition to the well-established anti-secretory effects, which may affect the cancer-associated paraneoplastic syndrome as well as the possible autotrophic actions of tumor-produced secretory proteins, a consistent body of data indicates that stimulation of tumor-expressed ssts results in a multi-step restrain of tumorigenesis. These mechanisms thus deserve further exploitation with the aim of validating novel therapeutic approaches to cancer.
|Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone.|
|Brazeau P, Vale W, Burgus R, Ling N, Butcher M, Rivier J, Guillemin R.|
|Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(68):77-9.|
|Growth-hormone release-inhibiting hormone in gastrointestinal and pancreatic D cells.|
|Polak JM, Pearse AG, Grimelius L, Bloom SR.|
|Lancet. 1975 May 31;1(7918):1220-2.|
|Effect of growth hormone-release inhibiting hormone on hormones stimulating exocrine pancreatic secretion.|
|Konturek SJ, Tasler J, Obtulowicz W, Coy DH, Schally AV.|
|J Clin Invest. 1976 Jul;58(1):1-6.|
|Human somatostatin I: sequence of the cDNA.|
|Shen LP, Pictet RL, Rutter WJ.|
|Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4575-9.|
|Cloning and characterization of a mRNA-encoding rat preprosomatostatin.|
|Funckes CL, Minth CD, Deschenes R, Magazin M, Tavianini MA, Sheets M, Collier K, Weith HL, Aron DC, Roos BA, Dixon JE.|
|J Biol Chem. 1983 Jul 25;258(14):8781-7.|
|Cloning and functional characterization of a family of human and mouse somatostatin receptors expressed in brain, gastrointestinal tract, and kidney.|
|Yamada Y, Post SR, Wang K, Tager HS, Bell GI, Seino S.|
|Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):251-5.|
|A human somatostatin receptor (SSTR3), located on chromosome 22, displays preferential affinity for somatostatin-14 like peptides.|
|Corness JD, Demchyshyn LL, Seeman P, Van Tol HH, Srikant CB, Kent G, Patel YC, Niznik HB.|
|FEBS Lett. 1993 Apr 26;321(2-3):279-84.|
|Cloning and characterization of a fourth human somatostatin receptor.|
|Rohrer L, Raulf F, Bruns C, Buettner R, Hofstaedter F, Schule R.|
|Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 1;90(9):4196-200.|
|Human somatostatin receptor genes: localization to human chromosomes 14, 17, and 22 and identification of simple tandem repeat polymorphisms.|
|Yamada Y, Stoffel M, Espinosa R 3rd, Xiang KS, Seino M, Seino S, Le Beau MM, Bell GI.|
|Genomics. 1993 Feb;15(2):449-52.|
|Molecular cloning, functional characterization, and chromosomal localization of a human somatostatin receptor (somatostatin receptor type 5) with preferential affinity for somatostatin-28.|
|Panetta R, Greenwood MT, Warszynska A, Demchyshyn LL, Day R, Niznik HB, Srikant CB, Patel YC.|
|Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Mar;45(3):417-27.|
|Molecular biology of somatostatin receptors.|
|Reisine T, Bell GI.|
|Endocr Rev. 1995 Aug;16(4):427-42. (REVIEW)|
|Somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 couple negatively to an L-type Ca2+ current in the pituitary cell line AtT-20.|
|Tallent M, Liapakis G, O'Carroll AM, Lolait SJ, Dichter M, Reisine T.|
|Neuroscience. 1996 Apr;71(4):1073-81.|
|Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtype-selective analogues differentially suppress in vitro growth hormone and prolactin in human pituitary adenomas. Novel potential therapy for functional pituitary tumors.|
|Shimon I, Yan X, Taylor JE, Weiss MH, Culler MD, Melmed S.|
|J Clin Invest. 1997 Nov 1;100(9):2386-92.|
|Somatostatin and its receptor family.|
|Front Neuroendocrinol. 1999 Jul;20(3):157-98. (REVIEW)|
|Gene regulation of somatostatin receptors in rats.|
|Baumeister H, Meyerhof W.|
|J Physiol Paris. 2000 May-Aug;94(3-4):167-77. (REVIEW)|
|The hallmarks of cancer.|
|Hanahan D, Weinberg RA.|
|Cell. 2000 Jan 7;100(1):57-70. (REVIEW)|
|Bim-23244, a somatostatin receptor subtype 2- and 5-selective analog with enhanced efficacy in suppressing growth hormone (GH) from octreotide-resistant human GH-secreting adenomas.|
|Saveanu A, Gunz G, Dufour H, Caron P, Fina F, Ouafik L, Culler MD, Moreau JP, Enjalbert A, Jaquet P.|
|J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jan;86(1):140-5.|
|The somatostatin-28(1-12)-NPAMAP sequence: an essential helical-promoting motif governing prosomatostatin processing at mono- and dibasic sites.|
|Brakch N, Lazar N, Panchal M, Allemandou F, Boileau G, Cohen P, Rholam M.|
|Biochemistry. 2002 Feb 5;41(5):1630-9.|
|Functional annotation of two orphan G-protein-coupled receptors, Drostar1 and -2, from Drosophila melanogaster and their ligands by reverse pharmacology.|
|Kreienkamp HJ, Larusson HJ, Witte I, Roeder T, Birgul N, Honck HH, Harder S, Ellinghausen G, Buck F, Richter D.|
|J Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 18;277(42):39937-43. Epub 2002 Aug 6.|
|Moller LN, Stidsen CE, Hartmann B, Holst JJ.|
|Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Sep 22;1616(1):1-84. (REVIEW)|
|Anti-migratory and anti-invasive effect of somatostatin in human neuroblastoma cells: involvement of Rac and MAP kinase activity.|
|Pola S, Cattaneo MG, Vicentini LM.|
|J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 17;278(42):40601-6. Epub 2003 Aug 5.|
|Signal transduction of somatostatin in human B lymphoblasts.|
|Rosskopf D, Schurks M, Manthey I, Joisten M, Busch S, Siffert W.|
|Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003 Jan;284(1):C179-90. Epub 2002 Sep 18.|
|Brain mapping of three somatostatin encoding genes in the goldfish.|
|Canosa LF, Cerda-Reverter JM, Peter RE.|
|J Comp Neurol. 2004 Jun 14;474(1):43-57.|
|Regulation and function of somatostatin receptors.|
|Olias G, Viollet C, Kusserow H, Epelbaum J, Meyerhof W.|
|J Neurochem. 2004 Jun;89(5):1057-91. (REVIEW)|
|Differential expression of two somatostatin receptor subtype 1 mRNAs in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).|
|Slagter BJ, Sheridan MA.|
|J Mol Endocrinol. 2004 Feb;32(1):165-77.|
|Arrestin-independent internalization of G protein-coupled receptors.|
|van Koppen CJ, Jakobs KH.|
|Mol Pharmacol. 2004 Sep;66(3):365-7.|
|Restoration of functional gap junctions through internal ribosome entry site-dependent synthesis of endogenous connexins in density-inhibited cancer cells.|
|Lahlou H, Fanjul M, Pradayrol L, Susini C, Pyronnet S.|
|Mol Cell Biol. 2005 May;25(10):4034-45.|
|Role of somatostatin analogs in the clinical management of non-neuroendocrine solid tumors.|
|Kvols LK, Woltering EA.|
|Anticancer Drugs. 2006 Jul;17(6):601-8. (REVIEW)|
|Modeling somatic evolution in tumorigenesis.|
|Spencer SL, Gerety RA, Pienta KJ, Forrest S.|
|PLoS Comput Biol. 2006 Aug 18;2(8):e108.|
|Rationale for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents.|
|Susini C, Buscail L.|
|Ann Oncol. 2006 Dec;17(12):1733-42. Epub 2006 Jun 26. (REVIEW)|
|Selective activation of somatostatin receptor subtypes differentially modulates secretion and viability in human medullary thyroid carcinoma primary cultures: potential clinical perspectives.|
|Zatelli MC, Piccin D, Tagliati F, Bottoni A, Luchin A, Vignali C, Margutti A, Bondanelli M, Pansini GC, Pelizzo MR, Culler MD, Degli Uberti EC.|
|J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Jun;91(6):2218-24. Epub 2006 Mar 28.|
|Heterooligomerization of human dopamine receptor 2 and somatostatin receptor 2 Co-immunoprecipitation and fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis.|
|Baragli A, Alturaihi H, Watt HL, Abdallah A, Kumar U.|
|Cell Signal. 2007 Nov;19(11):2304-16. Epub 2007 Jul 14.|
|Selective regulation of somatostatin receptor subtype signaling: evidence for constitutive receptor activation.|
|Ben-Shlomo A, Pichurin O, Barshop NJ, Wawrowsky KA, Taylor J, Culler MD, Chesnokova V, Liu NA, Melmed S.|
|Mol Endocrinol. 2007 Oct;21(10):2565-78. Epub 2007 Jul 3.|
|Novel chimeric somatostatin analogs: facts and perspectives.|
|Ferone D, Saveanu A, Culler MD, Arvigo M, Rebora A, Gatto F, Minuto F, Jaquet P.|
|Eur J Endocrinol. 2007 Apr;156 Suppl 1:S23-8. (REVIEW)|
|Novel insights in somatostatin receptor physiology.|
|Tulipano G, Schulz S.|
|Eur J Endocrinol. 2007 Apr;156 Suppl 1:S3-11. (REVIEW)|
|Involvement of somatostatin receptor subtypes in membrane ion channel modification by somatostatin in pituitary somatotropes.|
|Yang SK, Chen C.|
|Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007 Dec;34(12):1221-7. Epub 2007 Sep 25. (REVIEW)|
|Pasireotide, a multiple somatostatin receptor subtypes ligand, reduces cell viability in non-functioning pituitary adenomas by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor secretion|
|Zatelli MC, Piccin D, Vignali C, Tagliati F, Ambrosio MR, Bondanelli M, Cimino V, Bianchi A, Schmid HA, Scanarini M, Pontecorvi A, De Marinis L, Maira G, degli Uberti EC|
|Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007 Mar;14(1):91-102.|
|Molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative activity of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in neuroendocrine tumors.|
|Front Biosci. 2008a Jan 1;13:822-40. (REVIEW)|
|Somatostatin/somatostatin receptor signalling: phosphotyrosine phosphatases.|
|Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008b May 14;286(1-2):40-8. Epub 2007 Aug 31. (REVIEW)|
|Efficacy of a dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecule, BIM-23A760, in the control of cell growth from primary cultures of human non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a multi-center study.|
|Florio T, Barbieri F, Spaziante R, Zona G, Hofland LJ, van Koetsveld PM, Feelders RA, Stalla GK, Theodoropoulou M, Culler MD, Dong J, Taylor JE, Moreau JP, Saveanu A, Gunz G, Dufour H, Jaquet P.|
|Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008 Jun;15(2):583-96.|
|Intracellular trafficking of somatostatin receptors.|
|Jacobs S, Schulz S.|
|Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008 May 14;286(1-2):58-62. Epub 2007 Oct 16. (REVIEW)|
|The third intracellular loop of the human somatostatin receptor 5 is crucial for arrestin binding and receptor internalization after somatostatin stimulation.|
|Peverelli E, Mantovani G, Calebiro D, Doni A, Bondioni S, Lania A, Beck-Peccoz P, Spada A.|
|Mol Endocrinol. 2008 Mar;22(3):676-88. Epub 2007 Dec 20.|
|Antitumor effects of somatostatin.|
|Pyronnet S, Bousquet C, Najib S, Azar R, Laklai H, Susini C.|
|Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008 May 14;286(1-2):230-7. Epub 2008 Feb 13. (REVIEW)|
|Management of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).|
|Desai KK, Khan MS, Toumpanakis C, Caplin ME.|
|Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2009 Dec;55(4):425-43. (REVIEW)|
|Differential effects of octreotide and pasireotide on somatostatin receptor internalization and trafficking in vitro.|
|Lesche S, Lehmann D, Nagel F, Schmid HA, Schulz S.|
|J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Feb;94(2):654-61. Epub 2008 Nov 11.|
|Characterization of intracellular signaling mediated by human somatostatin receptor 5: role of the DRY motif and the third intracellular loop.|
|Peverelli E, Lania AG, Mantovani G, Beck-Peccoz P, Spada A.|
|Endocrinology. 2009 Jul;150(7):3169-76. Epub 2009 Apr 2.|
|The significance of new somatostatin analogs as therapeutic agents.|
|Zatelli MC, degli Uberti E.|
|Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2009 Oct;10(10):1025-31. (REVIEW)|
|Somatostatin and dopamine receptor interaction in prostate and lung cancer cell lines.|
|Arvigo M, Gatto F, Ruscica M, Ameri P, Dozio E, Albertelli M, Culler MD, Motta M, Minuto F, Magni P, Ferone D.|
|J Endocrinol. 2010 Dec;207(3):309-17. Epub 2010 Sep 27.|
|SOM230 (pasireotide) and temozolomide achieve sustained control of tumour progression and ACTH secretion in pituitary carcinoma with widespread metastases.|
|Bode H, Seiz M, Lammert A, Brockmann MA, Back W, Hammes HP, Thome C.|
|Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2010 Nov;118(10):760-3. Epub 2010 May 21.|
|Pasireotide (SOM230) demonstrates efficacy and safety in patients with acromegaly: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial.|
|Petersenn S, Schopohl J, Barkan A, Mohideen P, Colao A, Abs R, Buchelt A, Ho YY, Hu K, Farrall AJ, Melmed S, Biller BM; Pasireotide Acromegaly Study Group.|
|J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;95(6):2781-9. Epub 2010 Apr 21.|
|Regulation of prostate cancer cell proliferation by somatostatin receptor activation.|
|Ruscica M, Arvigo M, Gatto F, Dozio E, Feltrin D, Culler MD, Minuto F, Motta M, Ferone D, Magni P.|
|Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Feb 5;315(1-2):254-62. Epub 2009 Nov 20.|
|Written||2011-02||Liliana Steffani, Luca Passafaro, Diego Ferone, Paolo Magni, Massimiliano Ruscica|
|of Endocrinology, Pathophysiology, Applied Biology, Universita degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (LS; LP, PM, MR); Department of Internal Medicine, Universita degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy (DF)|
|This paper should be referenced as such :|
|Steffani, L ; Passafaro, L ; Ferone, D ; Magni, P ; Ruscica, M|
|Somatostatin (SS), SS receptors, SS analog treatment in tumorigenesis|
|Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. 2011;15(9):797-805.|
|Free journal version : [ pdf ] [ DOI ]|
|On line version : http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org/Anomalies/SomatostatinID20094.htm|
|© Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology||indexed on : Wed Sep 14 17:07:04 CEST 2016|
For comments and suggestions or contributions, please contact us