Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction syndrome

Schinzel-Giedion syndrome

The use of the long form of the name, Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction syndrome, is preferred to prevent confusion with Schinzel ulnar-mammary syndrome, a completely unrelated and clinically non-overlapping condition also described by Dr Schinzel.

Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction syndrome is presumed to be inherited as autosomal recessive on the basis of several pairs of affected sibs with normal parents. No specific gene or chromosome region has been identified. Among 44 reported families there are only 2 well-documented affected sib pairs and 2 more pairs in which a previous deceased sib was reported to have had similar anomalies. Therefore alternative hypotheses such as an autosomal dominant mutation, microdeletion, or microduplication with the few recurrence being explained by parental gonadal mosaicism must also be considered.

269150

C536632

798 Schinzel-Giedion syndrome

C0265227

The craniofacial appearance is essential to the diagnosis. Hydronephrosis is present in over 90% of cases. Other features, particularly skeletal findings, are helpful, but less specific. No generally accepted diagnostic guidelines exist.
Craniofacies: In addition to the pathognomonic \"midface retraction\" consisting of shallow orbits and midface hypoplasia with resulting prominence of the forehead, all reported patients have high forehead, large fontanelles and widely patent cranial sutures, particularly the metopic suture. The facial appearance is often described as coarse. Hypertelorism, flat nasal bridge, anteverted nares and lowset ears with protruding lobules are frequent. Nearly half the patients have choanal stenosis.
Central nervous system: Mental deficiency is usually profound. Both hypotonia and spasticity are common and may occur at different times in the same patient. Seizures of varying types, often including infantile spasms, are reported in most patients. Central nervous system malformations, particularly agenesis of the corpus callosum are reported occasionally, but the major anomaly on cranial MRI is cerebral atrophy which has been documented to progress over time in many of the longer surviving patients.
Skeletal: The skull base is steep, short, and often sclerotic with wide occipital synchondrosis, and multiple wormian bones. The ribs are broad and the clavicles are long. There is frequent hypoplasia of the first ribs, pubis, and distal phalanges. There is mild mesomelic shortening with widening of distal femur and increased density and broad cortex of the long bones. Additional limb anomalies such as polydactyly and talipes are found in a significant minority of patients.
Urogenital: Hydronephrosis on prenatal ultrasound is often the first abnormality noted. A few patients have died neonatally from lung hypoplasia related to either oligohydramnios sequence or compression from massive dilated kidneys. Virtually all patients have renal anomalies, primarily hydronephrosis, but only a few require treatment for obstructive lesions. Most patients have varying degrees of genital hypoplasia with hypospadias, micropenis and occasional ambiguous genitalia in males and labial hypoplasia, hymenal atresia and occasional bicornuate uterus in females.
Cardiac: About 1\/3 of the patients have congenital heart disease, most commonly atrial septal defect. Ventricular septal defect, pulmonic stenosis, AV canal, and carctation have also been reported.
Dermatologic: Most patients have hypertrichosis, redundant nuchal skin, hypoplastic nipples, hyperconvex nails and hypoplastic dermal ridges. Facial hemangiomas are common.
Other: Alacrima, visual impairment, hearing loss, macroglossia. Gingival hyperplasia occurs in long-term survivors.

Among 46 reported patients, 7 (15%) have had childhood tumors including 3 sacrococcygeal teratomas, 2 primitive neurectodermal tumors arising in the sacral area, 1 hepatoblastoma, and 1 Wilms tumor arising in a multicystic dysplastic kidney. Both of the latter tumors arose in older children (above age 2), raising concern that long term survivors need to be followed for possible tumor development. Because of early deaths and lack of follow-up reports for many patients, the reported incidence of tumors must be considered a minimal estimate. Among 15 patients known to have survived beyond age 2, three (20%) have had tumors.

Treatment is entirely symptomatic and directed at complications. The profound central nervous system involvement is the major cause of morbidity and mortality. Seizures are frequent and difficult to control with many patients failing to respond to anticonvulsants or ketogenic diet. Several patients with hearing loss have had some benefit from hearing aids. Hydronephrosis is usually stable, and only a few patients have required surgery for obstruction. Patients with tumors have responded to standard care including surgery and\/or chemotherapy.

Facial features may become less characteristic in long-term survivors. Hydronephrosis rarely progresses to renal failure. Progressive gingival hyperplasia in older patients raises concern about a storage disease, but patients coming to autopsy do not have evidence of a lysosomal disorder. Unfortunately the neurologic status tends to deteriorate over time. Developmental delay is usually profound with most patients remaining non-ambulatory and non-verbal throughout their lives. Seizures can develop at any age and tend to become increasingly difficult to control. Patients who were hypotonic as neonates may develop severe spasticity. Follow-up MRI studies often show worsening cerebral atrophy and increasing ventriculomegaly without obstructive hydrocephalus.

Half of all reported patients were deceased at the time of the initial report. 20% died in the first year, another 17% in the second year and 13% between 2 and 10 years of age. Only 4 patients (

Chromosome studies are normal in Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction syndrome. A single patient coincidentally had Klinefelter syndrome, which was not thought to contribute to the observed phenotype.

Tumor cytogenetic data are available in only one case, an infant with Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction and a neuroepithelial tumor in the sacral area. The infant had a normal 46, XY constitutional karyotype but the tumor contained a clone with duplication of the 17q22 region and a marker consisting of extra material from 17q {47,XY,dup?(17)(q22),+mar[5]-ishdup?(17)(q22)(wcp17+),der(17)(wcp17+)\/46,XY[35]}.

None known. The Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction phenotype is suggestive of biochemical or storage disease but metabolic studies and organ histology at autopsy are not indicative of any unusual material being stored.

http:\/\/www.schinzel-giedion.org Schinzel-Giedion Support Grouphttp:\/\/members.aol.com\/wjcufm\/patrick\/index2.htm Patricks Promise 14398 East Carroll Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio USA 44118