|Dipartimento Di Medicina, Chirurgia E Odontoiatria, Polo Universitario San Paolo, Genetica Medica, Via di Rudini, 8, 20142 Milano, Italy|
|ICD-Topo||C710-C714,C717-C719,C720-C725,C716 BRAIN, & CRANIAL NERVES, & SPINAL CORD, (EXCL. VENTRICLE, CEREBELLUM) / CEREBELLUM|
|ICD-Morpho||9380/3 Glioma, malignant|
|Phylum||Central Nervous system::Glioma|
|Note||Primary CNS tumors constitute a spectrum of pathological entities each with a distinct natural history that reflects the sequential accumulation of genetic lesions and the deregulation of growth-factor signalling pathways during neoplastic transformation. For simplicity, CNS tumors may be classified as GLIOMAS or NONGLIOMAS (see Table 1 which provides a summary of 2007 World Health Organization (WHO) classification). Relevant features in the present section will concern GLIOMAS, tumors that are thought to be of glial cell origin.|
| Table 1 WHO classification of Central Nervous System Tumors
Grade I is assigned to the more circumscribed tumors with low proliferative potential, grade II defines diffusely infiltrative tumours with cytological atypia alone, grade III those also showing anaplasia and mitotic activity and grade IV (Glioblastoma) tumours additionally showing microvascular proliferation and/or necrosis.
|Clinics and Pathology|
|Etiology||Gliomas account for >70% of all primary brain tumors. The most common (65%) and most malignant type is glioblastoma. With the exception of pilocytic astrocytomas, the prognosis of glioma patients is still poor. Less than 3% of glioblastoma patients are still alive at 5 years after diagnosis, higher age being the most significant predictor of poor outcome. Table 2 reports the population-based data of incidence rates (per 100,000 person per year) in 1992-1997 in United States adjusted to 2000 US population and the incidence rates in Zurich, Switzerland in 1980-1994 adjusted to 2000 US population.|
|Epidemiology|| Descriptive epidemiology largely depends on population-based cancer registries, which record cases according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O). The Central Brain tumor Registry of the United States is available at http://www.CBTRUS.org.|
No underlying cause has been identified for the majority of malignant gliomas. Epidemiologic factors including specific occupational exposures, environmental carcinogens, foods containing N-nitroso compounds, electromagnetic fields, etc. have been associated to only a small proportion of gliomas.
In addition, preliminary evidence points to a lower glioma risk among people with allergic conditions and high levels of serum IgE.
|Table 2 Population-based data of incidence rates, age and sex, and survival of patients with gliomas. From: Ohgaki H and Kleihues P. Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2005, 109: 93-108.|
| Table 3 Inherited mutations in members of families at increased risk of glioma. From Epidemiology and molecular pathology of glioma. Schwartzbaum JA, Fisher JL, Aldape KD and Wrensch M. Nat Clinical Practice Neurology 2006, 9:494-503.|
Table 4 Data are from Sathornsumetee et al.(3), Furnari et al.(18), Chi and Wen (20) and Sathornsumetee et al.(21).
PCV denotes procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine, and TMZ temozolomide.
† Radiotherapy is administered at a dose of 60 Gy given in 30 fractions over a period of 6 weeks. Concomitant TMZ is administered at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day for 42 days with radiotherapy. Beginning 4 weeks after radiotherapy, adjuvant TMZ is administered at a dose of 150 mg per square meter per day on days 1 to 5 of the first 28-day cycle, followed by 200 mg per square meter per day on days 1 to 5 of each subsequent 28-day cycle, if the first cycle was well tolerated.
‡ PCV therapy consists of lomustine (CCNU), 110 mg per square meter, on day 1; procarbazine, 60 mg per square meter, on days 8 to 21; and vincristine, 1.5 mg per square meter (maximum dose, 2 mg), on days 8 and 29.
|Treatment|| Management of Gliomas:|
Pilocytic astrocytoma, when totally resected, has a favourable outcome compared to other astrocytomas. However, when residual tumor remains, the prognosis is less satisfactory. It has been reported that radiation treatment after surgery suppresses residual tumor. Tumor location reveals a cerebellar predominance in both children and adults.
Favorable prognostic features include younger age at diagnosis, tumor size < 5cm and, possibly, greater extent of tumor resection. Late recurrences are relatively common, and patients should be followed up for at least 15 years. Despite their relatively indolent course, most astrocytomas eventually evolve into more anaplastic lesions and cannot be cured by surgery and radiation therapy.
Approximately half of oligodendrogliomas are characterized by loss of heterozygosity of chromosomes 1p and 19q, a pathognomonic diagnostic feature. For recurrent low-grade oligodendroglial tumors, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy may each play an important role.
Although uncommon, these tumors are recognized by their unique molecular, histologic and clinical features. Radiation therapy is the most commonly prescribed post-surgical therapy. The role and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy are less clear. Patients with 1p and 19q deletions have significantly better outcomes, regardless of treatment.
Anaplastic astrocytomas comprise 10-15% of all glial neoplasms. Currently, the only factors that have been shown to influence prognosis in patients with AA are age and Karnofsky performance status. The most important predictor of response to therapy and survival in AA tumors is the presence or absence of the 1p19q co-deletion, a molecular feature that defines a subset of oligodendroglial tumors, and anaplastic oligodendrogliomas in particular. A further likely prognostic biomarker is the methylation status of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltranferase gene (the predominant DNA repair enzyme following alkylator-based chemotherapy-induced injury). Evidence-based management of patients with AA recommends maximum safe resection followed by involved-field radiotherapy for newly diagnosed patients, and temozolomide (TMZ) for recurrent disease.
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)
Glioblastomas are among the most devasting neoplasms claiming the lives of patients within a median of 1 year after diagnosis. Although glioblastoma can occur at all ages, including childhood, the average age at which it is diagnosed is 55 years. Poor prognostic clinical variables include increasing age, poor performance status, increased severity of neurologic deficits ad diagnosis and the inability to achieve substantial tumor resection. Treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and so on. The extremely infiltrative nature of this tumors makes complete surgical removal impossible. Concurrent radiotherapy and the oral alkylating agent TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ has become the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, although the methylation status of the promoter region of the MGMT gene in the tumor specimen is associated with superior survival, regardless of received treatment.
Low-grade and anaplastic ependymomas
Ependymomas may occur anywhere in the spinal axis. In children, they are more commonly found in the posterior fossa and spinal cord. Both the low-grade and anaplastic lesions may disseminate along the leptomeningeal surfaces. Low-grade lesions in the spine are usually treated with surgery alone. Anaplastic or incompletely resected low-grade tumors are usually treated with postoperative radiation therapy. The role of chemotherapy is uncertain and in general should be reserved patients having previously failed surgery and radiotherapy. (see Table 4).
There is growing evidence that glioma stem cells may contribute to the resistance of malignant gliomas to standard treatments. Radioresistance in stem cells generally results from the preferential activation of DNA-damage-response pathways, whereas chemoresistance results partly from the overexpression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), the up-regulation of multidrug resistance genes, and the inhibition of apoptosis. Therapeutic strategies that effectively target stem cells sparing normal cells and overcome their resistance to treatment will be necessary if malignant gliomas are to be completely eradicated. Another determined obstacle to effective therapy is the invasive nature of glioma cells into the surrounding brain.
|Note|| Cytogenetic markers of glioma in adults|
The gain of chromosome 7 is the most frequent numerical aberration observed in Astrocytomas (WHO grade I) and Anaplastic Astrocytomas (WHO grade II). In AA other chromosomes showing a tendency toward gain are chromosomes 19 and 20. Chromosomes most often lost include 10 and 22 and a single sex chromosome. Among the oligodendroglioma karyotypes the majority have normal or nonclonal chromosomal pattern often associated with isolated sex chromosomes. The genetic instability of Glioblastoma results in numerous subpopulations and isolated cell types: nonetheless several non-random chromosome changes, in particular aneuploidies, are associated with the progression of this tumor. The numerical abnormalities are similar to the lower-grade tumors, involving the gain of chromosomes 7 and 20 and the loss of chromosomes 10 and 22 and sex chromosomes. In general, numerical changes appear to include more loss than gain of chromosomes, and this is reflected in the frequent loss of 9p and chromosomes 13 and 14. Monosomy of chromosome 22 is the most frequent alteration observed in ependymomas, in addition to deletions or translocations involving 22q.
In addition to alterations in chromosome number, most solid tumors are also characterized by centrosome amplification. Centrosome nucleates and organizes the cytoplasmic and mitotic spindle microtubules (MTs) in interphase and mitotic cells, respectively. Because the centrosome is actively involved in proper chromosome segregation during mitosis, it has been hypothesized that centrosome amplification drives tumor aneuploidy by increasing the frequency of abnormal mitosis that lead to chromosome missegregation. In a recent work on primary diffuse astrocytic gliomas Katsetos et al. reported the overexpression of gamma-tubulin, the key structural component of centrosome, associated with supernumerary centrosomes .Interphase and -metaphase amplified centrosomes in glioma cell lines are visible in Figure 1, a and b respectively (personal observations).
Chromosomal imbalances of glioma in childhood and adolescence
Pilocytic astrocytomas account for 23.5% of pediatric brain tumors. The most common aberration consisted of 6q, followed by 7q gain, and loss of 9q. The imbalance +7q is observed in other gliomas such as pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and ependymomas, whereas -9q is the most frequent alteration in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and is also present in anaplastic astrocytomas.
Anaplastic astrocytomas account for 7.2% of childhood brain tumors. Among the investigated tumors the most common chromosomal alterations were gains of 5q and 1q and losses of 22q, 9q and 12q.
Glioblastomas account for 7.2% of pediatric brain tumors. The most frequent reported chromosomal imbalances were losses of 17p and 13q whereas gains included 1q, 2q, 3q and 17q .Compared with adult cases, gains of 1p, 2q and 21q as well as losses of 6q, 11q and 16q were more frequently observed among pediatric malignant astrocytomas, supporting differences between childhood and adult chromosomal abnormalities and different genetic pathways.
Oligodendroglial tumors are rare in the pediatric population and only isolated cases have been investigated.
Ependymomas comprise 10.1% of pediatric brain tumors. Among the tumor group investigated classic and anaplastic ependymomas are characterized by +1q, whereas all 3 entities (including the myxopapillary variant) frequently show +9. Other imbalances observed were +7q as well as -22q.
|Cytogenetics Molecular|| Molecular pathology of glioma|
Different studies applying cytogenetic, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), array-CGH and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) methods demonstrated non-random genomic aberrations in gliomas. The characterization of genomic abnormalities enhanced to identify specific genes involved in tumor initiation and progression.
Table 5 summarizes the most common detectable chromosome changes in glioma.
|Table 5 From Epidemiology and molecular pathology of glioma. Schwartzbaum JA, Fisher JL, Aldape KD and Wrensch M. Nat Clinical Practice Neurology 2006, 9:494-503.|
|Genes involved and Proteins|
|Note|| Genetic pathways to Glioblastoma |
Three pathways are implicated :
The p16 / RB1 pathway seems to be important in pathways to both primary and secondary GBM. The RB1 inactivation on 13q and CDK4 amplification, also mutually exclusive, are more frequent in anaplastic gliomas. PTEN inactivation on chromosome 10q and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification and/or rearrangement are more frequent in glioblastomas.
The scheme in Figure 2 depicts the genetic pathways to Glioblastoma.
The major signalling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of glioblastomas are depicted in Figure 3 and then shortly commented.
|Note||EGFR is activated upon the binding of growth factors to its extracellular domain, resulting in recruitment of P13K to the cell membrane. P13K in turn phosphorylates phosphatidynositol-4,5-biphosphate to the 3-phosphate(PIP3), which activates downstream effector molecules such as AKT (protein kinase B) and mTOR leading to cell proliferation and enhanced cell survival by blocking apoptosis. PTEN downregulates the PIP3 signal, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation. The PTEN gene is mutated in up to 40% of glioblastomas and almost exclusively in primary glioblastomas (Fig.1).|
| Figure 2: Genetic pathways associated with glioblastoma formation. A (astrocytomas), O (oligodendroglioma), GBMO (glioblastoma with oligodendroglial component). The amplified genes are indicated by +. The chromosomes deleted and the genes inactivated are indicated by -.|
Figure 3: From Genetic Pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Hiroko Ohgaki and Paul Kleihues The Am J Pathol 2007 May;170(5):1445-53 review.
|Note|| The TP53 is involved in several cellular processes, including the cell cycle, response of cells to DNA damage, cell death, cell differentiation, and neovascularisation. After DNA damage, TP53 is activated and induces transcription of genes such as p21. MDM2 binds to mutant and wild-type TP53 proteins, thereby inhibiting the ability of wild-type TP53 to activate the transcription. Conversely, transcription of the MDM2 gene is induced by wild-type TP53. Whereas TP53 activity and MDM2 expression in normal cells are regulated by the above autoregulatory feedback loop and by the p14ARF gene product that inhibits MDM2-p53 degradation, in human cancer cell lines p14ARF expression inversely correlates with TP53.|
This means that loss of TP53 function may result from abnormal expression of any of the TP53, MDM2, or p14ARF genes.
|Note|| After DNA damage, TP53 is activated and induces transcription of genes such as p21. MDM2 binds to mutant and wild-type TP53 proteins, thereby inhibiting the ability of wild-type TP53 to activate the transcription. Conversely, transcription of the MDM2 gene is induced by wild-type TP53. Whereas TP53 activity and MDM2 expression in normal cells are regulated by the above autoregulatory feedback loop and by the p14ARF gene product that inhibits MDM2-p53 degradation, in human cancer cell lines p14ARF expression inversely correlates with TP53.|
This means that loss of TP53 function may result from abnormal expression of any of the TP53, MDM2, or p14ARF genes.
|Note||p14ARF is an alternate reading frame protein product of the CDKN2A locus (i.e. INK4a/ARF locus) Whereas TP53 activity and MDM2 expression in normal cells are regulated by the above autoregulatory feedback loop and This means that loss of TP53 function may result from abnormal expression of any of the TP53, MDM2, or p14ARF genes.|
|Note||P16INK4a binds to CDK4, inhibits the CDK4/cyclin D1 complex and in turn blocks the G1-S transition. Consequently, the loss of normal RB1 function may depend on the altered expression of any of the RB1, P16INK4a, or CDk4 genes.|
|Dna / Rna||p16 is a tumor suppressor protein, that in humans is encoded by the CDKN2A gene.|
|Note||The RB1 protein controls the progression through G1 to S phase of the cell cycle. The CDK4 / cyclin D1 complex phosphorylates the RB1 protein, determining the release of the E2F transcription factor that activates genes involved in the G1 -S transition. P16INK4a binds to CDK4, inhibits the CDK4/cyclin D1 complex and in turn blocks the G1 -S transition. Consequently, the loss of normal RB1 function may depend on the altered expression of any of the RB1, P16INK4a, or CDk4 genes.|
|Management of glioblastoma.|
|Aoki T, Hashimoto N, Matsutani M.|
|Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007 Dec;8(18):3133-46.|
|Genomic alterations in low-grade, anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas.|
|Arslantas A, Artan S, Oner U, Muslumanoglu MH, Ozdemir M, Durmaz R, Arslantas D, Vural M, Cosan E, Atasoy MA.|
|Pathol Oncol Res. 2007;13(1):39-46. Epub 2007 Mar 27.|
|Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response.|
|Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN.|
|Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):756-60. Epub 2006 Oct 18.|
|Blakeley J, Grossman S.|
|Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2008 Jul;10(4):295-307.|
|What is the etiology of human brain tumors? A report on the first Lebow conference.|
|Brem S, Rozental JM, Moskal JR.|
|Cancer. 1995 Aug 15;76(4):709-13.|
|Clinical and molecular characteristics of malignant transformation of low-grade glioma in children.|
|Broniscer A, Baker SJ, West AN, Fraser MM, Proko E, Kocak M, Dalton J, Zambetti GP, Ellison DW, Kun LE, Gajjar A, Gilbertson RJ, Fuller CE.|
|J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 20;25(6):682-9.|
|Central nervous system tumors.|
|Buckner JC, Brown PD, O'Neill BP, Meyer FB, Wetmore CJ, Uhm JH.|
|Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Oct;82(10):1271-86.|
|A population-based study of the incidence and survival rates in patients with pilocytic astrocytoma.|
|Burkhard C, Di Patre PL, Schuler D, Schuler G, Yas,argil MG, Yonekawa Y, Lutolf UM, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H.|
|J Neurosurg. 2003 Jun;98(6):1170-4.|
|Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003 May;3(3):193-9.|
|Tumour stem cells and drug resistance.|
|Dean M, Fojo T, Bates S.|
|Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Apr;5(4):275-84.|
|Epidemiology of brain tumors.|
|Fisher JL, Schwartzbaum JA, Wrensch M, Wiemels JL.|
|Neurol Clin. 2007 Nov;25(4):867-90, vii.|
|A t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma.|
|Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV, Giannini C, Arusell RM, Law M, Flynn H, Passe S, Felten S, Brown PD, Shaw EG, Buckner JC.|
|Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;66(20):9852-61.|
|Occupational exposure to low frequency magnetic fields and the risk of low grade and high grade glioma.|
|Karipidis KK, Benke G, Sim MR, Yost M, Giles G.|
|Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Apr;18(3):305-13. Epub 2007 Jan 27.|
|Altered cellular distribution and subcellular sorting of gamma-tubulin in diffuse astrocytic gliomas and human glioblastoma cell lines.|
|Katsetos CD, Reddy G, Draberova E, Smejkalova B, Del Valle L, Ashraf Q, Tadevosyan A, Yelin K, Maraziotis T, Mishra OP, Mork S, Legido A, Nissanov J, Baas PW, de Chadarevian JP, Draber P.|
|J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006 May;65(5):465-77.|
|Invasion as limitation to anti-angiogenic glioma therapy.|
|Lamszus K, Kunkel P, Westphal M.|
|Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;88:169-77.|
|The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system.|
|Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P.|
|Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109. Epub 2007 Jul 6.|
|Molecular pathology of malignant gliomas.|
|Annu Rev Pathol. 2006;1:97-117.|
|A recurrent 19q11-12 breakpoint suggested by cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of three glioblastoma cell lines.|
|Magnani I, Chiariello E, Conti AM, Finocchiaro G.|
|Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1999 Apr 15;110(2):82-6.|
|Increasing complexity of the karyotype in 50 human gliomas. Progressive evolution and de novo occurrence of cytogenetic alterations.|
|Magnani I, Guerneri S, Pollo B, Cirenei N, Colombo BM, Broggi G, Galli C, Bugiani O, DiDonato S, Finocchiaro G, et al.|
|Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1994 Jul 15;75(2):77-89.|
|GLIOGENE an International Consortium to Understand Familial Glioma.|
|Malmer B, Adatto P, Armstrong G, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Bernstein JL, Claus E, Davis F, Houlston R, Il'yasova D, Jenkins R, Johansen C, Lai R, Lau C, McCarthy B, Nielsen H, Olson SH, Sadetzki S, Shete S, Wiklund F, Wrensch M, Yang P, Bondy M.|
|Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Sep;16(9):1730-4.|
|New primary neoplasms of the central nervous system in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.|
|Neglia JP, Robison LL, Stovall M, Liu Y, Packer RJ, Hammond S, Yasui Y, Kasper CE, Mertens AC, Donaldson SS, Meadows AT, Inskip PD.|
|J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Nov 1;98(21):1528-37.|
|Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma.|
|Ohgaki H, Kleihues P.|
|Am J Pathol. 2007 May;170(5):1445-53.|
|Population-based study on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations of low-grade diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas.|
|Okamoto Y, Di Patre PL, Burkhard C, Horstmann S, Jourde B, Fahey M, Schuler D, Probst-Hensch NM, Yasargil MG, Yonekawa Y, Lutolf UM, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H.|
|Acta Neuropathol. 2004 Jul;108(1):49-56. Epub 2004 Apr 28.|
|Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors.|
|Pihan GA, Purohit A, Wallace J, Knecht H, Woda B, Quesenberry P, Doxsey SJ.|
|Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 1;58(17):3974-85.|
|Comparative genomic hybridization in central and peripheral nervous system tumors of childhood and adolescence.|
|Rickert CH, Paulus W.|
|J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004 May;63(5):399-417.|
|Identification of novel genomic markers related to progression to glioblastoma through genomic profiling of 25 primary glioma cell lines.|
|Roversi G, Pfundt R, Moroni RF, Magnani I, van Reijmersdal S, Pollo B, Straatman H, Larizza L, Schoenmakers EF.|
|Oncogene. 2006 Mar 9;25(10):1571-83.|
|Occupational exposure to pesticides and risk of adult brain tumors.|
|Samanic CM, De Roos AJ, Stewart PA, Rajaraman P, Waters MA, Inskip PD.|
|Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 15;167(8):976-85. Epub 2008 Feb 24.|
|Molecular changes in gliomas.|
|Sanson M, Thillet J, Hoang-Xuan K.|
|Curr Opin Oncol. 2004 Nov;16(6):607-13.|
|Epidemiology and molecular pathology of glioma.|
|Schwartzbaum JA, Fisher JL, Aldape KD, Wrensch M.|
|Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006 Sep;2(9):494-503; quiz 1 p following 516.|
|Genetic alterations associated with adult diffuse astrocytic tumors.|
|Am J Med Genet. 2002 Oct 30;115(3):194-201.|
|Malignant gliomas in adults.|
|Wen PY, Kesari S.|
|N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 31;359(5):492-507.|
|Allergy-related polymorphisms influence glioma status and serum IgE levels.|
|Wiemels JL, Wiencke JK, Kelsey KT, Moghadassi M, Rice T, Urayama KY, Miike R, Wrensch M.|
|Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1229-35.|
|Allergic conditions and brain tumor risk.|
|Wigertz A, Lonn S, Schwartzbaum J, Hall P, Auvinen A, Christensen HC, Johansen C, Klaeboe L, Salminen T, Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Tynes T, Feychting M.|
|Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Oct 15;166(8):941-50. Epub 2007 Jul 23.|
|This paper should be referenced as such :|
|Nervous System: Glioma: an overview|
|Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. 2009;13(8):591-599.|
|Free journal version : [ pdf ] [ DOI ]|
|On line version : http://AtlasGeneticsOncology.org/Tumors/GliomaOverviewID5763.html|
|Other genes implicated (Data extracted from papers in the Atlas) [ 149 ]|
|Translocations implicated (Data extracted from papers in the Atlas)|
|Mitelman database||del(19q) [Case List] del(19q) [Association List] Mitelman database (CGAP - NCBI)|
|Mitelman database||del(1p) [Case List] del(1p) [Association List] Mitelman database (CGAP - NCBI)|
|Mitelman database||t(1;19)(q10;q10) [Case List] t(1;19)(q10;q10) [Association List] Mitelman database (CGAP - NCBI)|
|arrayMap||Topo ( C71,C72) arrayMap ((UZH-SIB Zurich) [auto + random 100 samples .. if exist ] [tabulated segments]|
|Other database||ICGC Data Portal - [GBM-US] Brain Glioblastoma Multiforme - TCGA, US|
|Other database||ICGC Data Portal - [LGG-US] Brain Lower Grade Gliona - TCGA, US|
|Other database||ICGC Data Portal - [PBCA-DE] Pediatric Brain Cancer - DE|
|Other database||cBioPortal: Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA, Provisional)|
|Other database||Glioma ( My Cancer Genome)|
|Other database||Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) TCGA Copy Number Portal|
|Other database||Glioblastoma multiforme ( intOGen )|
|Other database||Glioblastoma multiforme ( intOGen )|
|Other database||Lower grade glioma ( intOGen )|
|Other database||Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA)(OASIS Portal)|
|Other database||Glioblastoma (TCGA)(OASIS Portal)|
|Other database||Brain Lower Grade Glioma (TCGA)(OASIS Portal)|
|Other database||Brain Tumour Overview - Disease Synopsis [canSAR]|
|Other database||Glioblastoma Multiforme [ Genomic Data Commons - NCI TCGA-GBM]|
|Disease database||Nervous System: Glioma: an overview|
|REVIEW articles||automatic search in PubMed|
|Last year articles||automatic search in PubMed|
|© Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology||indexed on : Wed May 3 17:28:00 CEST 2017|
For comments and suggestions or contributions, please contact us